Back

From lab to ocean: bridging swimming energetics and wild movements to understand red drum (Sciaenops ocellatus) behavior in a tidal estuary

Gibbs, B.; Strother, J.; Morgan, C.; Pinton, D.; Canestrelli, A.; Liao, J. C.

2026-04-07 animal behavior and cognition
10.64898/2026.04.03.716345 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Understanding how fish navigate complex natural environments requires bridging fine-scale biomechanics with ecological behavior. We investigated the volitional movement and energetics of wild red drum (Sciaenops ocellatus) across laboratory, mesocosm, and field settings. Using flow-respirometry, we quantified metabolic costs and swimming kinematics under ecologically relevant flow conditions shaped by bluff bodies mimicking mangrove roots and oyster mounds. Fish swimming in turbulent wakes exhibited reduced oxygen consumption and altered tailbeat dynamics, especially at high flow speeds. In a large outdoor mesocosm, dual accelerometers revealed a rich behavioral repertoire, including maneuvering and rest, which is not easily observable in confined lab settings. Spectral analysis and clustering identified eight distinct locomotory states, highlighting the limitations of summed acceleration metrics. Field telemetry tracked wild red drum across a 54 km estuarine corridor for a three-year period through an array of 36 acoustic receivers, revealing movement patterns shaped by tidal flow and physical habitats. Hydrodynamic modeling revealed that while laboratory trials demonstrated substantial energetic savings at high flows (approaching 100 cm/s), wild fish were detected predominantly in low-velocity microhabitats (<30 cm/s) near structurally complex features. This mismatch suggests that habitat selection is an adaptive strategy driven by ecological factors such as foraging opportunities, predation refuge, and site fidelity, rather than hydrodynamic efficiency alone. Our multi-scalar approach demonstrates that while flow-structure interactions can reduce locomotor costs for fish, habitat use in the wild reflects broader ecological constraints, offering a framework for integrating biomechanics, physiology, and ecology in conservation-relevant contexts.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Experimental Biology
249 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
28.0%
2
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
189 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
8.5%
3
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 9%
8.3%
4
Current Biology
596 papers in training set
Top 3%
6.4%
50% of probability mass above
5
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 23%
4.9%
6
Movement Ecology
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.6%
7
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 39%
3.6%
8
Frontiers in Marine Science
55 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.6%
9
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 27%
2.1%
10
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
341 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.1%
11
Integrative And Comparative Biology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.9%
12
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 15%
1.8%
13
Coral Reefs
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.8%
14
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 51%
1.7%
15
Royal Society Open Science
193 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
16
Methods in Ecology and Evolution
160 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.5%
17
Bioinspiration & Biomimetics
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.5%
18
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
60 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
19
Integrative Organismal Biology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.1%
20
Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience
12 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.0%
21
Ethology
18 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
22
Journal of Fish Biology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
23
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 31%
0.8%
24
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
53 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
25
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.7%
26
The Journal of Neuroscience
928 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.5%
27
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 34%
0.5%