Back

Kinome profiling allows examination and prediction of kinase inhibitor cardiotoxicity

Tabet, J. S.; Joisa, C. U.; Jensen, B. C.; Gomez, S. M.

2026-04-07 systems biology
10.64898/2026.04.03.716310 bioRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundDespite improved cancer outcomes with kinase inhibitors (KIs), their cardiotoxicity remains a significant clinical challenge. Current approaches to predict and prevent KI-induced cardiac adverse events (CAEs) are limited by an incomplete understanding of underlying mechanisms, including the contribution of off-target kinase engagement. ObjectivesTo establish links between kinase inhibition profiles and cardiotoxic phenotypes using empirical proteomic data, and to leverage these profiles in machine learning (ML) models capable of predicting KI cardiotoxicity. MethodsWe curated a database connecting kinome-wide target binding profiles of FDA-approved KIs (n=44) with documented incidence rates of six distinct CAEs. Binding profiles were derived from unbiased chemoproteomics and used to assess associations between KI selectivity, specific kinase targets, and CAEs. Profiles were further used to develop ML models to predict CAE risk, with SHAP-based model interpretation applied to identify cardiotoxicity-associated kinases. ResultsKI promiscuity was not a significant predictor of cardiotoxicity across all six CAEs. Frequency analysis revealed that kinases including RET, PDGFRB, and DDR1 are recurrently inhibited across CAE-linked compounds, with nearly all identified as off-targets not annotated by the FDA. Network and pathway enrichment analyses supported a systems-level model in which cardiotoxicity arises from coordinated disruption of cardiac-relevant signaling networks. ML models achieved 66-84% cross-validated accuracy (ROC-AUC 0.75-0.8) across CAE endpoints, with SHAP analysis identifying PDGFRB, EGFR, and MEK1/2 among the most predictive kinases. ConclusionsProteomic kinome profiling combined with machine learning provides a mechanistically grounded framework for predicting KI cardiotoxicity and supports off-target-aware drug design to minimize cardiovascular risk.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Circulation: Genomic and Precision Medicine
42 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
22.6%
2
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 6%
6.4%
3
npj Digital Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
6.4%
4
Genome Medicine
154 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.9%
5
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 31%
4.0%
6
npj Precision Oncology
48 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.7%
7
Integrative Biology
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.6%
50% of probability mass above
8
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 39%
3.6%
9
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 44%
2.7%
10
Cellular and Molecular Bioengineering
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.1%
11
Cell Reports Medicine
140 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.1%
12
BMC Bioinformatics
383 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.9%
13
npj Systems Biology and Applications
99 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
14
JCI Insight
241 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.5%
15
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 36%
1.3%
16
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 22%
1.2%
17
Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics
25 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.2%
18
Frontiers in Pharmacology
100 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
19
Bioinformatics Advances
184 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.1%
20
Communications Medicine
85 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.9%
21
Frontiers in Oncology
95 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
22
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 33%
0.7%
23
Clinical Cancer Research
58 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
24
Patterns
70 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
25
Bioinformatics
1061 papers in training set
Top 10%
0.7%
26
Molecular & Cellular Proteomics
158 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
27
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 59%
0.7%
28
Journal of Medicinal Chemistry
68 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
29
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 17%
0.6%
30
JCO Clinical Cancer Informatics
18 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.6%