Back

The SAUERKRAUT transposable element acceleratesArabidopsis floral transition

Dongus, J. A.; Tang, Y. H.; van Driel, A. D.; Schon, M. A.; Pleunis, E. T.; Duijts, K.; Debnath, J.; Koevoets, I. T.; Kokkinopoulou, P.; de Zeeuw, T.; Ortega, S.; Meyer, A. J.; Blok, A. M.; Boesten, R.; Testerink, C.

2026-04-06 plant biology
10.64898/2026.04.03.715599 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Salt stress alters plant development, including the floral transition, but regulation of timing of flowering by salt is poorly understood at the molecular level. To identify genetic loci regulating the floral transition under high soil salinity, we performed a genome-wide association study (GWAS) in Arabidopsis thaliana and identified natural variation at the UGT74E1-UGT74E2-BT3 (UUB) locus that correlates with bolting time specifically in response to salt stress. Genetic analysis revealed BT3 as a novel repressor of the floral transition in control conditions. Similarly, the putative IBA glycosylases UGT74E1 & UGT74E2 delay the floral transition in control conditions. Furthermore, we identified that IBA homeostasis regulators TOB1 and ECH2/IBR10 play a key role in the floral transition, and that ECH2/IBR10 are required for the early flowering phenotype of the ugt74e1/ugt74e2 double mutant, indicating that UGT74E1 & UGT74E2 delay flowering by altering IBA homeostasis. A pangenome analysis of the UUB locus revealed variation in the occurrence of the DNA transposon SAUERKRAUT (SKRT). CRISPR-mediated SKRT deletion in Col-0 affected gene expression both within and outside the UUB locus and caused a salt-dependent delayed floral transition. The delayed bolting phenotype of the skrt-2 mutant also depends on ECH2/IBR10 function, indicating that SKRT accelerates the floral transition by altering IBA homeostasis. Finally, targeted demethylation of SKRT resulted in delayed floral transition under salt stress. Taken together, our data show a role for SKRT and its DNA methylation levels in the salt-dependent bolting time response in Arabidopsis, revealing a novel molecular mechanism to control flowering in adverse conditions.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 8%
17.2%
2
PLOS Genetics
756 papers in training set
Top 1%
10.2%
3
The Plant Cell
141 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
9.0%
4
Journal of Experimental Botany
195 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
8.1%
5
Plant Physiology
217 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
4.8%
6
Molecular Plant
36 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.2%
50% of probability mass above
7
New Phytologist
309 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.5%
8
Plant Communications
35 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.5%
9
The Plant Journal
197 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.5%
10
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 22%
3.2%
11
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 29%
3.2%
12
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 52%
2.0%
13
Frontiers in Plant Science
240 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
14
Plant, Cell & Environment
78 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.7%
15
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 25%
1.6%
16
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 20%
1.5%
17
Nucleic Acids Research
1128 papers in training set
Top 13%
1.3%
18
Journal of Genetics and Genomics
36 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
19
Plant and Cell Physiology
31 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
20
Horticulture Research
43 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
21
Science China Life Sciences
26 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
22
Frontiers in Genetics
197 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.9%
23
Plant Science
25 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.8%
24
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 67%
0.8%
25
Journal of Integrative Plant Biology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
0.7%
26
Genomics, Proteomics & Bioinformatics
171 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.7%
27
Plant And Cell Physiology
16 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%