Interpretable Machine Learning for Population-Level Severe Tooth Loss Prediction: A Two-Axis External Validation
LAM, Q. T.; Fan, F.-Y.; Wang, Y.-L.; Wu, C.-Y.; Sun, Y.-S.; Vo, T. T. T.; Kuo, H.; Kha, Q. H.; Le, M. H. N.; Vu, G.; Le, N. Q. K.; Lee, I.-T.
Show abstract
Objectives: Machine learning can predict severe tooth loss (STL, 6 or more missing teeth), but opaque black-box models neglecting complex survey designs limit clinical adoption. This study developed and externally validated an intrinsically interpretable, survey-weighted framework for population-level STL prediction, capturing complex socio-behavioral and systemic health determinants. Methods: We analyzed nationally representative data from BRFSS 2022 (derivation, N=433,772), BRFSS 2024 (temporal validation, N=448,213), and the clinically examined NHANES 2015-2018 (cross-domain validation, N=10,775). Missing data were resolved using an anti-leakage HistGradientBoosting MICE pipeline, preserving multivariate epidemiological variance. An Explainable Boosting Machine (EBM, GA2M) was natively trained by integrating complex survey weights. For external clinical validation, structural domain shift was addressed through non-parametric Isotonic Regression recalibration. Results: The EBM achieved strong temporal stability on BRFSS 2024 (AUC: 0.8627; Brier Score: 0.0845). Upon cross-domain validation against NHANES 2015-2018, the calibrated model demonstrated robust transportability (AUC: 0.7504; Brier Score: 0.1358). Notably, the zero-shot EBM (AUC: 0.7591) closely matched the predictive ceiling of a black-box stacked meta-ensemble (AUC: 0.7706), eliminating the need for unstable post-hoc approximations. Fully auditable shape functions explicitly revealed non-linear risk thresholds and synergistic pairwise interactions for key predictors including age, smoking, income, and diabetes. Decision curve analysis confirmed substantial positive net clinical benefit across a 5%-50% risk threshold continuum. Conclusions: The MICE-EBM framework predicts STL with complete intrinsic transparency and robust probabilistic reliability. By successfully generalizing across unobserved temporal and clinical cohorts, this TRIPOD+AI compliant framework provides a clinically deployable tool to optimize targeted dental public health interventions.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Modular Clinical Decision Support Networks (MoDN)—Updatable, Interpretable, and Portable Predictions for Evolving Clinical Environments 92%
- Population Analysis Of Mortality Risk: Predictive Models Using Motion Sensors For 100,000 Participants In The UK Biobank National Cohort 91%
- Generalizability Challenges of Mortality Risk Prediction Models: A Retrospective Analysis on a Multi-center Database 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Diagnostic Codes in AI prediction models and Label Leakage of Same-admission Clinical Outcomes 89%
- Machine Learning for Dynamic and Short-term Prediction of Preeclampsia Using Routine Clinical and Laboratory Data 89%
- Estimating the Burden of Influenza on Daily Activity at Population Scale Using Commercial Wearable Sensors 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- Statistical learning shapes pain perception and prediction independently of external cues 90%
- Using normative models pre-trained on cross-sectional data to evaluate intra-individual longitudinal changes in neuroimaging data 90%
- Extent, impact, and mitigation of batch effects in tumor biomarker studies using tissue microarrays 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- Prediction models for post-discharge mortality among under-five children with suspected sepsis in Uganda: A multicohort analysis 88%
- The Impact of Mask-Wearing in Mitigating the Spread of COVID-19 During the Early Phases of the Pandemic 88%
- Derivation and external validation of a clinical prognostic model identifying children at risk of death following presentation for diarrheal care 88%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.