sctrial: Participant-Level Differential Analysis for Longitudinal Single-Cell Experiments
Vasanthakumari, P.; Valencia, I.; Aghmiouni, M. R.; Magana, B.; Omar, M. N.
Show abstract
Longitudinal single-cell RNA sequencing studies in clinical trials and translational cohorts offer a powerful view of treatment response, disease progression, and cellular dynamics, but their hierarchical structure poses a major inferential challenge: thousands of cells are measured within the same participants across repeated time points, whereas the participant, not the cell, is the true unit of biological replication. Conventional cell-level workflows can therefore yield inflated significance and misleading confidence in reported associations. Here, we present sctrial, an open source analytical framework for repeated-measures single-cell studies that uses design-specific participant-level estimands, including difference-in-differences for two-group longitudinal comparisons, and small-cluster-aware uncertainty quantification. In simulation benchmarks using a hierarchical gamma-Poisson generative model, sctrial maintained well-calibrated error rates in mixed-signal gene panels where established multi-subject methods showed inflated false positive rates among unaffected genes. We applied sctrial to five independent datasets spanning melanoma immunotherapy, COVID-19 severity, BNT162b2 vaccination, AML chemotherapy, and CAR-T therapy. Across these studies, sctrial identified immune programs whose direction and magnitude differed across therapeutic and disease contexts, while benchmarking analyses showed that many associations highlighted by conventional cell-level workflows were attenuated or no longer supported when inference was performed at the participant level. These analyses illustrate how participant-aware inference can reduce pseudoreplication-driven signal inflation and provide a more rigorous basis for interpreting longitudinal single-cell data. sctrial enables reproducible participant-level analysis of longitudinal single-cell experiments and facilitates more reliable biological interpretation in translational and clinical studies. The software is implemented in Python and compatible the AnnData/scverse ecosystem.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Projecting single-cell transcriptomics data onto a reference T cell atlas to interpret immune responses 97%
- Genome-scale spatial mapping of the Hodgkin lymphoma microenvironment identifies tumor cell survival factors 97%
- LAG-3 blockade reactivates the CD8+ T cell expansion program to re-expand contracted clones in the tumor 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Prioritization of autoimmune disease-associated genetic variants that perturb regulatory element activity in T cells 96%
- Fine-mapping causal tissues and genes at disease-associated loci 96%
- Linking regulatory variants to target genes by integrating single-cell multiome methods and genomic distance 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Integrative, high-resolution analysis of single cell gene expression across experimental conditions with PARAFAC2-RISE 96%
- Conserved epigenetic regulatory logic infers genes governing cell identity 95%
- Distinct gene programs underpinning 'disease tolerance' and 'resistance' in influenza virus infection 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Gene regulatory network inference from CRISPR perturbations in primary CD4+ T cells elucidates the genomic basis of immune disease 97%
- Impact of disease-associated chromatin accessibility QTLs across immune cell types and contexts 97%
- Functional Inference of Gene Regulation using Single-Cell Multi-Omics 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Chromatin conformation dynamics during CD4+ T cell activation implicates autoimmune disease-associated genes and regulatory elements 95%
- RAG suppresses group 2 innate lymphoid cells 95%
- Patient-derived xenografts and single-cell sequencing identifies three subtypes of tumor-reactive lymphocytes in uveal melanoma metastases 95%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.