Back

On the causes of correlated genomic ancestry across contrasting hybridization histories in a monkeyflower species pair.

Farnitano, M. C.; Sotola, V. A.; Sweigart, A. L.

2026-04-04 evolutionary biology
10.64898/2026.04.02.716215 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Hybridization is a powerful force shaping the evolutionary trajectories of species, yet its outcomes are highly variable both across taxa and within a pair of species. In this study, we examine the processes shaping variation in the extent of hybrid ancestry, both among populations and across the genome. We use low-coverage sequencing data to infer local ancestry across the genome for 782 individuals from multiple populations across two geographic regions within the broadly overlapping range of Mimulus guttatus and Mimulus nasutus. We find that the extent of hybrid ancestry is variable across populations, supporting disparate historical patterns of hybridization. However, genomic patterns of hybrid ancestry are correlated across groups, indicating they are shaped by parallel processes. Correlations are highest in geographically proximal populations, including between sympatric and allopatric locations, providing evidence that introgression is not locally constrained but spreads via migration across the landscape. We find that features of the genome are predictive of hybrid ancestry and its correlations among populations. However, contrary to findings in some other species, these patterns are likely not driven by simple linked selection against hybrid ancestry. Genomic outliers for high hybrid ancestry are often shared among populations, suggesting a role for parallel positive selection on ancestry. However, known loci associated with reproductive isolation are poor predictors of ancestry variation across populations, indicating that selection acting in natural hybrid populations is highly polygenic and that the underlying genetic architecture varies across space. Overall, this study demonstrates how ecological, demographic, and genomic features all interact to shape the outcomes of hybridization.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Nature Ecology & Evolution
113 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
12.2%
2
Science
429 papers in training set
Top 2%
12.0%
3
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 5%
11.8%
4
Evolution Letters
71 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
8.8%
5
Evolution
199 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
8.1%
50% of probability mass above
6
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 31%
6.1%
7
Current Biology
596 papers in training set
Top 3%
6.1%
8
Molecular Ecology
304 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.7%
9
Molecular Biology and Evolution
488 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.4%
10
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 29%
3.1%
11
Cell
370 papers in training set
Top 8%
2.9%
12
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 11%
2.5%
13
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
341 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.3%
14
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.0%
15
The American Naturalist
114 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
16
PLOS Genetics
756 papers in training set
Top 9%
1.6%
17
The American Journal of Human Genetics
206 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
18
Cell Host & Microbe
113 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
19
Genome Biology
555 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.7%
20
Nature
575 papers in training set
Top 17%
0.6%
21
New Phytologist
309 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%
22
Nature Genetics
240 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.6%