Back

Mount Fuji's stubby peak: the genotypic density of additive landscapes near maximal fitness

Kinney, J. B.

2026-04-06 evolutionary biology
10.64898/2026.04.02.716185 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Additive fitness landscapes--also called Mount Fuji landscapes--are the simplest and most widely used models of sequence-function relationships. As such, they play essential roles across multiple areas of biology, including evolutionary theory, quantitative genetics, gene regulation, and protein science. One of the most basic properties of any fitness landscape is its genotypic density--the number of sequences near a given fitness value. Understanding this density is especially important near fitness peaks, as it quantifies the supply of high-fitness genotypes. Here I study the genotypic density of additive landscapes near fitness peaks. Although this density is well known to be approximately Gaussian near the middle of the fitness range, its behavior near maximal fitness has not been reported. I begin by deriving a saddle-point approximation that accurately describes the genotypic density of additive landscapes over virtually the entire fitness range. I then show that the log density follows a power law near maximal fitness, with an exponent determined by how much the best allele at each position outperforms its nearest competitor. This power-law behavior holds over a substantial fraction of fitness values, besting the Gaussian approximation on both simulated and empirical landscapes across roughly a quarter to a third of the fitness range. Under certain conditions this behavior also extends to globally epistatic landscapes (defined as nonlinear functions over one or more additive traits), though with a reduced range of validity. These findings advance our understanding of one of the most fundamental models of sequence-function relationships. In particular, they reveal that the uppermost reaches of Mount Fuji landscapes, rather than being sharply peaked, are actually quite stubby.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
22.6%
2
Evolution
199 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
17.6%
3
Genetics
225 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
8.4%
4
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
7.2%
50% of probability mass above
5
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 5%
6.4%
6
GENETICS
189 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.9%
7
Cell Systems
167 papers in training set
Top 5%
2.7%
8
Molecular Biology and Evolution
488 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.7%
9
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 32%
2.6%
10
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 45%
2.5%
11
The American Naturalist
114 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
2.1%
12
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 59%
1.7%
13
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
189 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
14
Evolution Letters
71 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
15
Journal of Theoretical Biology
144 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
16
Nature Ecology & Evolution
113 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
17
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
341 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.2%
18
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 28%
0.8%
19
Theoretical Population Biology
47 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.7%
20
Journal of Evolutionary Biology
98 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.7%
21
Ecology Letters
121 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
22
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 69%
0.7%
23
PNAS Nexus
147 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
24
Physical Review Research
46 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%