Back

Differing effects of parasite-parasite interaction types on the spatial epidemiology of co-circulating parasites

Zilio, G.; Zabalegui Bayona, J.; Rousseau, L.; Raichle, J.; Gougat-Barbera, C.; Duncan, A. B.; Dean, A. D.; Kaltz, O.; Fenton, A.

2026-04-04 ecology
10.64898/2026.04.02.716128 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Interactions among co-circulating parasite species influence infection risk and disease progression. Such interactions can occur within hosts, for example altering susceptibility, or indirectly through host demography or movement, potentially affecting landscape-scale transmission. Despite their ubiquity, the spatial implications of these interactions have received limited attention. We combine spatially-explicit modelling with laboratory experiments to investigate how different parasite-parasite interactions influence disease spread. We model within-host, demographic, and dispersal-related interactions across a linear landscape, showing that within-host interactions modifying host susceptibility have the strongest effects on parasite prevalence, spatial heterogeneity, and rate of spread. Furthermore, these effects are amplified when parasites invade sequentially, generating pronounced patch-level spatial priority effects. We tested these predictions experimentally using a protist host (Paramecium caudatum) and two bacterial parasites (Holospora undulata and H. obtusa). Consistent with model predictions, we found that H. obtusa reduces prevalence and spatial spread of H. undulata through reductions in host susceptibility, and found evidence for spatial priority effects, observing reduced H. undulata prevalence when introduced after H. obtusa. Our theoretical and experimental results highlight that parasite-parasite interactions can have important implications for parasite spatial epidemiology, but the magnitude of those effects depend on the interaction type and the timing of invasion.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
341 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
13.8%
2
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.0%
3
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
189 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
6.1%
4
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 7%
4.7%
5
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 19%
4.7%
6
Nature Ecology & Evolution
113 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.0%
7
Ecology Letters
121 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.8%
8
Evolution
199 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
3.5%
50% of probability mass above
9
The American Naturalist
114 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
3.5%
10
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 41%
3.5%
11
Journal of Animal Ecology
63 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.5%
12
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 52%
2.0%
13
Current Biology
596 papers in training set
Top 9%
1.8%
14
Peer Community Journal
254 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.8%
15
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 32%
1.7%
16
Oikos
74 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.6%
17
Ecology
70 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.6%
18
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 11%
1.6%
19
Evolution, Medicine, and Public Health
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.3%
20
PLOS Pathogens
721 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.2%
21
Journal of Applied Ecology
35 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.2%
22
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
53 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.2%
23
Molecular Ecology
304 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
24
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 26%
0.9%
25
Ecological Modelling
24 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
26
Functional Ecology
53 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.9%
27
The ISME Journal
194 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
28
Science
429 papers in training set
Top 18%
0.9%
29
Ecology and Evolution
232 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
30
Theoretical Ecology
21 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.7%