Back

A Rapid and Universal Pipeline for High-Resolution GPCR Structure Determination through In Silico Construct Optimization and de novo Protein Design

Kojima, A.; Kawakami, K.; Kobayashi, N.; Kobayashi, K.; Matsui, T. E.; Uemoto, K.; Gu, Y.; Narita, T. J.; Kugawa, M.; Fukuda, M.; Kato, H. E.

2026-04-06 biophysics
10.64898/2026.04.02.716066 bioRxiv
Show abstract

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are critical regulators of human physiology and major drug targets. Although structural studies have provided valuable insights, determining GPCR structures remains challenging, especially for inactive state receptors. Recent advances in cryo-electron microscopy (cryo-EM) have enabled structural determination of small GPCRs by using fusion partner proteins and binders to increase molecular weight. However, current methods require extensive experimental screening of fusion constructs. Widely adopted strategies, such as BRIL-Fab complexes, also face limitations due to inherent flexibility. Here, we introduce a streamlined and universal pipeline that integrates an in silico fusion construct screening program, NOAH (NOAH: NOn-experimental, AI-assisted High-throughput construct screening), with a de novo designed fusion protein called ARK1 (ARtificially-designed fiducial marKer). We validate the efficacy of NOAH by determining the structures of the vasopressin V2 receptor (V2R) bound to the clinical antagonist tolvaptan and the partial agonist OPC51803, as well as the bradykinin B2 receptor (B2R) bound to the clinical antagonist icatibant, thereby elucidating their activation and deactivation mechanisms. Furthermore, we demonstrate the capability of NOAH-ARK1 by solving the tolvaptan-bound V2R structure at higher resolution and showcase the methods versatility by determining the structure of lysophosphatidic acid receptor 2 (LPA2) bound to the antagonist Ki16425. This approach eliminates the need for time-consuming and labor-intensive construct optimization, providing a rapid and widely applicable solution for high-resolution GPCR structure determination and drug discovery.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Structure
175 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
22.5%
2
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 13%
12.7%
3
Cell Discovery
54 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
6.8%
4
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 13%
6.4%
5
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
4.9%
50% of probability mass above
6
Nature Methods
336 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.9%
7
Cell Research
49 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
4.0%
8
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 20%
3.6%
9
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 6%
3.1%
10
Journal of Structural Biology
58 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.4%
11
The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters
58 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.1%
12
Communications Chemistry
39 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.9%
13
Science
429 papers in training set
Top 13%
1.9%
14
Cell Reports Methods
141 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
15
Protein Science
221 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
16
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 66%
1.2%
17
IUCrJ
29 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.2%
18
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 24%
1.1%
19
Journal of the American Chemical Society
199 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
20
Angewandte Chemie International Edition
81 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
21
Acta Crystallographica Section D Structural Biology
54 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.6%
22
Nature Computational Science
50 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
23
Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences
100 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.6%
24
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 37%
0.6%
25
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
453 papers in training set
Top 18%
0.6%