Back

Heterogeneous Sensitivity to Src Inhibitors in Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma and Its Implications for Combination Therapy with Cisplatin

Ofusa, Y.; Noguchi, T.; Mizukami, H.; Ohba, K.

2026-04-06 cancer biology
10.64898/2026.04.02.716058 bioRxiv
Show abstract

PurposeTreatment options of advanced oral squamous cell carcinomas (OSCC) are limited, and cisplatin toxicity and drug resistance are major clinical issues. Src is a central kinase that integrates multiple oncogenic pathways and a promising therapeutic target. However, Src inhibitors have shown suboptimal efficacy as monotherapies and their sensitivity in OSCC remains elusive. Experimental DesignWe examined the activation of major oncogenic signaling pathways and the antitumor effects of six Src inhibitors (dasatinib, ponatinib, vandetanib, saracatinib, PP2, bosutinib) in seven human OSCC cell lines (HSC-2, HSC-3, HSC-4, SAS, HO-1-u-1, CAL27, SCC-25). BALB/cAJcl nu/nu mice bearing CAL27 xenografts received dasatinib (30 mg/kg, intraperitoneally, daily), bosutinib (50 mg/kg, intraperitoneally, daily), cisplatin (2 mg/kg or 4 mg/kg, intraperitoneally, weekly), or combinations. Tumor volume, bioluminescence imaging, and body weight were monitored for 17 or 21 days, followed by histopathological assessment. ResultsThe activation of the key pathways, including Src and MAPK, considerably differed among the cell lines and was linked to heterogeneous sensitivity to Src inhibitors. Effective growth suppression required Src dephosphorylation and downstream MAPK pathway inhibition, which vary depending on the cell line. Additionally, combination treatment with a Src inhibitor and cisplatin showed additive antitumor effects, allowing the reduction of cisplatin doses by half without efficacy loss. Notably, dasatinib alone and in combination with cisplatin decreased tumor burden with characteristic internal tumor death in vivo. ConclusionsThese findings elucidate Src signaling dependency on OSCC and the potential of Src inhibition to decrease cisplatin toxicity, paving way for Src targeted therapeutic strategies.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Frontiers in Oncology
95 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.6%
2
Cancers
200 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
12.4%
3
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 17%
10.5%
4
Cancer Medicine
24 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.2%
5
British Journal of Cancer
42 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
6.3%
50% of probability mass above
6
Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
33 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.9%
7
Molecular Oncology
50 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.6%
8
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 36%
3.6%
9
BMC Cancer
52 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
3.6%
10
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.9%
11
International Journal of Cancer
42 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.7%
12
Oncogene
76 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
13
npj Precision Oncology
48 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.7%
14
Medicine
30 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
15
Oncotarget
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.2%
16
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 58%
1.0%
17
Frontiers in Immunology
586 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.9%
18
JCI Insight
241 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.9%
19
Cureus
67 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
20
Molecular & Cellular Proteomics
158 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
21
Diagnostics
48 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
22
Annals of Oncology
13 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
23
Journal of Translational Medicine
46 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
24
Biochemistry and Biophysics Reports
28 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
25
Cancer Research
116 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%
26
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.5%
27
BioMed Research International
25 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.5%
28
Clinical Cancer Research
58 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%
29
Cancer Research Communications
46 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%
30
Frontiers in Pharmacology
100 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.5%