Back

Phosphorylation of the rod-tail hinge region of cingulin regulates its interaction with nonmuscle myosin-2B

Rouaud, F.; Mutero-Maeda, A.; Borgo, C.; Ruzzene, M.; Citi, S.

2026-04-05 cell biology
10.64898/2026.04.02.716052 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The tight junction (TJ) protein cingulin binds directly to nonmuscle myosin 2B (NM2B) through sequences in its C-terminal rod-tail region and recruits it to tight junctions (TJ) to control membrane cortex mechanics, epithelial morphogenesis and cingulin conformation. However, the minimal sequence required for cingulin-NM2B interaction and how this interaction is regulated is not known. Here we identify a 19-aminoacid sequence at the hinge between the cingulin rod and tail that is required for cingulin-NM2B interaction, and we investigate the role of phosphorylation of Ser residues within this region in regulating this interaction. Immunofluorescence microscopy localization of NM2B in cingulin-KO cells rescued with mutant cingulin constructs shows that phospho-mimetic but not dephospho-mimetic cingulin mutants inhibit NM2B recruitment to junctions and downstream regulation of cingulin conformation and TJ tortuosity, correlating with cingulin-NM2B interaction, as determined by GST pulldown analysis. In contrast, either phospo-or dephospho-mimetic mutants of Ser residues within the cingulin head domain do not affect either NM2B recruitment to TJ, or cingulin conformation and localization in cells, or TJ membrane tortuosity. Finally, Ser residues within the hinge display the consensus sequence for protein kinases CK1 and CK2, and, through in vitro phosphorylation, site mutation analysis and use of inhibitors, we identify a complex interplay between CGN phospho-sites, with a prominent negative role of Ser1162 phosphorylation in the regulation of cingulin-NM2B interaction. In summary, we show that cingulin-NM2B interaction is regulated by cingulin phosphorylation within the hinge and identify a potential role for CK1 and CK2 kinases in cingulin phosphorylation.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Molecular Biology of the Cell
272 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
17.9%
2
Journal of Cell Biology
333 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
16.9%
3
Journal of Cell Science
353 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.8%
4
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 9%
6.1%
5
PLOS Genetics
756 papers in training set
Top 3%
4.7%
50% of probability mass above
6
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 18%
3.8%
7
Journal of Biological Chemistry
641 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
3.5%
8
Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
218 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.5%
9
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 28%
3.5%
10
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 48%
2.3%
11
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 47%
2.0%
12
Biology Open
130 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.8%
13
Developmental Cell
168 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.8%
14
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.8%
15
Structure
175 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.6%
16
EMBO reports
136 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.6%
17
Current Biology
596 papers in training set
Top 10%
1.6%
18
Cytoskeleton
23 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.4%
19
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 57%
1.4%
20
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 20%
1.3%
21
Life Science Alliance
263 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
22
Biophysical Journal
545 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.6%
23
Cells
232 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.6%
24
PLOS Pathogens
721 papers in training set
Top 10%
0.6%