Back

Probabilistic Co-Control in Brain-Computer Interfaces: Uncertainty as a Control Signal in Brain-to-Text Decoding

Huang, J.; Narasimha, S. M.; Patel, A. N.; Sristi, R. D.; Mishne, G.; Gilja, V.

2026-04-06 bioengineering
10.64898/2026.04.02.715749 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Neural decoders serve as probabilistic interfaces in co-control brain-to-text BCIs, where predicted uncertainty shapes hypothesis generation and language model integration, enabling decisions to be made safely under uncertainty. However, it remains unclear whether these decoders produce reliable and informative uncertainty, or how training objectives shape these properties. This work characterizes and improves uncertainty representations in brain-to-text decoding. We extend two metrics, calibration error (ECE) and resolution (RES), to evaluate sequential probabilistic predictions from frame-level phoneme estimates to word-level hypotheses, quantifying the reliability and informativeness of model uncertainty. Using this framework, we analyze neural decoders trained with connectionist temporal classification (CTC). To isolate the causal role of uncertainty independent of accuracy, we manipulate predicted probability distributions while holding predicted sequences fixed. Motivated by the observed failures, we further examine the role of the training objective and propose a two-stage cross-entropy (CE) formulation that decouples alignment inference from classification. We show that widely used CTC-trained neural decoders in brain-to-text BCIs produce systematically over-confident predictions, with high confidence persisting even when predictions are incorrect. Controlled manipulations of the prediction reveal that improved ECE and RES enhance hypothesis generation and language-model integration by promoting diverse alternatives and more effective re-ranking of hypotheses aligned with user intent. Mechanistically, CTC relies on over-confident predictions to resolve alignment ambiguity. Replacing CTC with CE loss yields significantly more reliable and informative probabilistic predictions without degrading decoding accuracy. Uncertainty emerges as a system-level design variable in brain-to-text interfaces. Calibrated uncertainty from neural decoders enables effective integration with independently trained language models and reliable error detection. This work reframes uncertainty from a passive output into an active control signal, identifies key components and evaluation criteria for probabilistic co-control, and outlines a pathway toward next-generation BCIs that supports increasingly complex interactions with the world.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Neural Engineering
197 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
25.6%
2
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 3%
14.4%
3
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 2%
12.5%
50% of probability mass above
4
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 31%
4.0%
5
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 40%
3.6%
6
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 45%
2.6%
7
Cell Systems
167 papers in training set
Top 5%
2.4%
8
Nature Machine Intelligence
61 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.8%
9
IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering
38 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.7%
10
Nature Biomedical Engineering
42 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.7%
11
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 11%
1.7%
12
Nature Neuroscience
216 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.7%
13
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 26%
1.5%
14
Neuron
282 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.5%
15
The Journal of Neuroscience
928 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.5%
16
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 47%
1.3%
17
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
189 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
18
Nature Medicine
117 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
19
npj Digital Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
20
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
21
Network Neuroscience
116 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.9%
22
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 17%
0.9%
23
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 26%
0.9%
24
Cancer Research
116 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
25
Human Brain Mapping
295 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
26
Frontiers in Neuroscience
223 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.7%
27
Imaging Neuroscience
242 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
28
Journal of Vision
92 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%