Back

Backfill Bayesian Ordered Lattice Design for Phase I Clinical Trials

WANG, G.-M.; Tatsuoka, C.

2026-04-06 oncology
10.64898/2026.04.02.26350086 medRxiv
Show abstract

The Bayesian Ordered Lattice Design (BOLD) method for Phase I clinical trials is extended to address an important challenge. It is widely understood that conventional Phase I trial designs are not consistently effective in determining safe and active dose levels. The US FDA launched the Project Optimus, aimed at reforming the paradigms of dose optimization and selection. We propose a backfill BOLD design (BF-BOLD) that centers on BOLD for dose-finding but also adds an activity evaluation for each patient. Our method for determining the optimal biological dose (OBD) first involves identifying the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and then assessing activity rates among dose levels below the identified MTD. This approach is straightforward and does not require complex statistical modeling. The results of the simulation indicate that performing dose-finding trials with backfilling can both enhance safety and activity assessment, thereby improving treatment sustainability while also preserving the potential for efficacy of the Recommended Phase II Dose (RP2D). We also demonstrate the applicability of the backfill design for reducing overdose rates, and as a more attractive alternative to small-scale dose expansion trials that follow dose escalation. Backfill designs are an important design approach for early phase trials.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 2%
12.3%
2
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 10%
8.4%
3
Bulletin of Mathematical Biology
84 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
8.4%
4
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 24%
7.2%
5
JCO Clinical Cancer Informatics
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.4%
6
Computers in Biology and Medicine
120 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
6.4%
7
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 37%
4.0%
50% of probability mass above
8
International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics
21 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.1%
9
Cancer Research
116 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.7%
10
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 7%
2.7%
11
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 36%
2.1%
12
Frontiers in Oncology
95 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
13
Cancers
200 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.9%
14
Journal of Theoretical Biology
144 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.7%
15
Clinical Cancer Research
58 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.7%
16
Interface Focus
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.5%
17
Briefings in Bioinformatics
326 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.5%
18
Frontiers in Neuroscience
223 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.3%
19
Frontiers in Pharmacology
100 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
20
BMC Bioinformatics
383 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.2%
21
Frontiers in Genetics
197 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.2%
22
NeuroImage
813 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.2%
23
BMC Cancer
52 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
24
Artificial Intelligence in Medicine
15 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
25
npj Systems Biology and Applications
99 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
26
npj Digital Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
27
Cancer Research Communications
46 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
28
Radiotherapy and Oncology
18 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.7%
29
JCO Precision Oncology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
30
Bioinformatics
1061 papers in training set
Top 10%
0.7%