Back

A Protocol for Identifying Priorities for Women+ Health in the Maritime Provinces using a Priority Setting Partnership Approach

Dol, J.; Pritchett, C.; Larocque, L.; Bentley, J.; Brooks, M.; Elliott Rose, A.; Rosen, N.; Davies, E.; Yeluri, M.; Gosse, M.

2026-04-03 health systems and quality improvement
10.64898/2026.04.02.26350048 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background/Objectives: Women+ (e.g., women and individuals assigned female at birth) experience disproportionate health risks and persistent gaps in access to care, despite regionally coordinated health systems. Women+ health research remains significantly underfunded and understudied, contributing to inequities in diagnosis, treatment, and outcomes. This study aims to collaboratively identify and prioritize the most pressing unanswered research questions related to women+ health in the Maritime provinces of Canada. Methods: This study will use a modified Priority Setting Partnership (PSP) methodology based on the James Lind Alliance framework. A mixed-methods participatory approach will be used, including bilingual online surveys (French, English) and a one-day consensus workshop. Participants will include women+, healthcare professionals, researchers, policymakers, and the public residing in the Maritime provinces (Nova Scotia, New Brunswick, and Prince Edward Island). An initial survey will collect research uncertainties through open-ended questions. A second interim survey will rank verified uncertainties, followed by a facilitated workshop to achieve consensus on the Top 10 research priorities. Qualitative data will be analyzed using content analysis, and descriptive statistics will summarize participant demographics. Anticipated Results: This project is expected to generate a collaboratively developed, evidence-informed Top 10 list of research priorities for women+ health in the Maritimes. The process will also identify thematic gaps in existing research and assess feasibility considerations to inform future study design and implementation. Conclusions: By centering women+ voices and engaging diverse interest holders, this study will establish a shared regional research agenda to guide future research, funding, and policy initiatives for women+ health research.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 3%
28.7%
2
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
19.4%
3
PLOS Global Public Health
293 papers in training set
Top 1%
7.1%
50% of probability mass above
4
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 1%
5.0%
5
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
124 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.5%
6
Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness
16 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.5%
7
BMC Health Services Research
42 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
3.7%
8
JMIR Research Protocols
18 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.7%
9
BMJ Global Health
98 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
3.7%
10
BMJ Open Quality
15 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.0%
11
Health Expectations
12 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.8%
12
Canadian Medical Association Journal
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.5%
13
Archives of Public Health
12 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.3%
14
Royal Society Open Science
193 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.0%
15
BMC Public Health
147 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
16
SSM - Population Health
17 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
17
BMC Medical Education
20 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.8%
18
Journal of Global Health
18 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
19
F1000Research
79 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
20
Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
18 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.7%
21
Trials
25 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%
22
Journal of Public Health
23 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%