A Protocol for Identifying Priorities for Women+ Health in the Maritime Provinces using a Priority Setting Partnership Approach
Dol, J.; Pritchett, C.; Larocque, L.; Bentley, J.; Brooks, M.; Elliott Rose, A.; Rosen, N.; Davies, E.; Yeluri, M.; Gosse, M.
Show abstract
Background/Objectives: Women+ (e.g., women and individuals assigned female at birth) experience disproportionate health risks and persistent gaps in access to care, despite regionally coordinated health systems. Women+ health research remains significantly underfunded and understudied, contributing to inequities in diagnosis, treatment, and outcomes. This study aims to collaboratively identify and prioritize the most pressing unanswered research questions related to women+ health in the Maritime provinces of Canada. Methods: This study will use a modified Priority Setting Partnership (PSP) methodology based on the James Lind Alliance framework. A mixed-methods participatory approach will be used, including bilingual online surveys (French, English) and a one-day consensus workshop. Participants will include women+, healthcare professionals, researchers, policymakers, and the public residing in the Maritime provinces (Nova Scotia, New Brunswick, and Prince Edward Island). An initial survey will collect research uncertainties through open-ended questions. A second interim survey will rank verified uncertainties, followed by a facilitated workshop to achieve consensus on the Top 10 research priorities. Qualitative data will be analyzed using content analysis, and descriptive statistics will summarize participant demographics. Anticipated Results: This project is expected to generate a collaboratively developed, evidence-informed Top 10 list of research priorities for women+ health in the Maritimes. The process will also identify thematic gaps in existing research and assess feasibility considerations to inform future study design and implementation. Conclusions: By centering women+ voices and engaging diverse interest holders, this study will establish a shared regional research agenda to guide future research, funding, and policy initiatives for women+ health research.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Artificial Intelligence for Contextual Well-being: Protocol for an Exploratory Sequential Mixed Methods Study with Medical Students as a Social Microcosm 94%
- How do perceptions of Covid-19 risk impact pregnancy-related health decisions? A convergent parallel mixed-methods study protocol 94%
- Comprehensive profiling of social mixing patterns in resource poor countries: a mixed methods research protocol 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Psychological, social and financial impact of COVID-19 on culturally and linguistically diverse communities: a cross-sectional Australian study 94%
- Ethnicity and COVID-19 outcomes among healthcare workers in the United Kingdom: UK-REACH ethico-legal research, qualitative research on healthcare workers’ experiences, and stakeholder engagement protocol 93%
- How can rural community-engaged health services planning affect sustainable health care system changes? - A process description and qualitative analysis of data from the Rural Coordination Centre of British Columbia’s Rural Site Visits Project 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Perceptions of barriers and facilitators for cervical cancer screening from women and healthcare workers in Ghana: Applying the Dynamic Sustainability Framework 94%
- Measures to assess quality of postnatal care: a scoping review 93%
- Mentorship in Health Research Institutions in Africa: A Systematic Review of Approaches, Benefits, Successes, Gaps and Challenges 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Women’s knowledge, attitudes and views of preconception health and intervention delivery methods: A cross-sectional survey 94%
- What are the mechanisms of effect of group antenatal care? A systematic realist review and synthesis of the literature 92%
- A Cross-Sectional Survey Of Australian Women'S Perspectives And Experiences Of Exercise During Pregnancy, Including Women That Experience Mental Illness 92%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.