Back

Modelling the tail-phase pharmacokinetics of long-acting cabotegravir and rilpivirine from early pregnancy to postpartum at steady state

Atoyebi, S.; Waitt, C.; Olagunju, A.

2026-04-07 hiv aids
10.64898/2026.04.02.26350020 medRxiv
Show abstract

Long-acting cabotegravir and rilpivirine combination (LA-CAB/RPV) is approved for HIV treatment whilst long-acting cabotegravir alone (LA-CAB) is approved for HIV prevention, both in adults. However, individuals who become pregnant might prefer to discontinue it due to lack of definitive data on safety. The aim of this study was to characterise the tail-phase maternal and fetal pharmacokinetics of LA-CAB/RPV following discontinuation at steady-state early in pregnancy. A virtual population of non-pregnant women (n = 100 per scenario) initiated intramuscular injections of LA-CAB/RPV at the approved dosage and continued maintenance dose (400/600 mg once monthly or 600/900 mg once every two months) until steady state. We simulated discontinuation at steady state after only one injection during pregnancy. Tail-phase pharmacokinetics of CAB and RPV from LA injections were characterised during gestation and until 6 months postpartum. Pharmacokinetic tails of LA-CAB/RPV were driven by the residual drug in the muscle depot which stabilised at steady state and reduced steadily upon dosing discontinuation. Upon discontinuation of the monthly dosing, predicted median (IQR) maternal plasma concentrations for LA-CAB were 415 (386-448) ng/mL at delivery and 125 (115-139) ng/mL 6 months postpartum. For LA RPV, these were 11.6 (11.0-12.6) ng/mL and 7.84 (7.30-8.49) ng/mL at delivery and 6 months postpartum, respectively. Pharmacokinetic tails of LA-CAB/RPV extend to several months postpartum, with levels falling below established minimum effective concentration in most women after gestation week 33. Potential strategies to minimise potential risks associated with LA-CAB/RPV discontinuation in this population are needed.

Matching journals

The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.