Back

Sustainability and nutritional composition of food choices in hospital canteens: a pre-post intervention study

Mansutti, E.; Fiori, F.; Menis, D.; Cautero, P.; Graziani, C. L.; Zago, D.; Driutti, M.; Lesa, L.; Grillone, L.; Cortelazzo, F.; Cosolo, A.; Mauro, M.; Scarpis, E.; Conte, A.; Parpinel, M.; Brunelli, L.

2026-04-05 public and global health
10.64898/2026.04.02.26349952 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background: Hospital canteens provide an effective setting for improving the dietary habits of users. The study evaluates the food choices of users after an educational and environmental intervention, considering nutritional composition and environmental impact, and to compare the results with pre-intervention choices. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted in three hospital canteens (C1, C2, C3) in northeastern Italy, during two index weeks in September 2022 (T0) and 2023 (T1). An intervention was introduced between T0 and T1, consisting of posters on healthy eating, descriptive norm messages, and environmental changes regarding fruit and vegetables. Photos of lunch trays were collected, and choices were analyzed for nutritional composition and sustainability. Results: 2,851 trays were analyzed: 1,227 at T0 (798 in C1, 228 in C2 and 201 in C3) and 1,624 at T1 (1,005 in C1, 348 in C2, 271 in C3). In C1 and C3, there was an increase in median energy (+30 kcal; +135 kcal) compared to pre-intervention meals, while in C2 there was a decrease (-118 kcal). Despite a slight improvement in macronutrient composition, at T1 meals in all canteens were still high in lipids (30%E; 39%E; 35%E) and low in carbohydrates (44%E; 39%E; 41%E). The fibre value fell within the recommended range only in C1 and C3. The median carbon (CF) and water (WF) footprints of meals in all canteens remained high: at T1 CF ranged from 966 gCO2eq. to 1,227 gCO2eq. and WF from 1,025 L H2O to 1,207 L H2O. Conclusion: The intervention has led to partial improvements in food choices. To achieve more significant results, it may be necessary to implement a parallel intervention on food offer.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 6%
22.9%
2
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
124 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
12.7%
3
Current Developments in Nutrition
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.7%
4
International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.3%
50% of probability mass above
5
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 45%
2.6%
6
BMC Public Health
147 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.9%
7
Nutrients
64 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.9%
8
Journal of Environmental Management
11 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
9
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.5%
10
Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness
16 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.4%
11
Environment International
42 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.4%
12
European Journal of Public Health
20 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.4%
13
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 10%
1.2%
14
Open Research Europe
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.0%
15
The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
60 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
16
Science of The Total Environment
179 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
17
Frontiers in Psychology
49 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
18
Journal of Medical Internet Research
85 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
19
Public Health Nutrition
14 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
20
Food Research International
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
21
Public Health
34 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
22
International Journal of Public Health
17 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
23
Archives of Public Health
12 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.7%
24
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.7%
25
The Journal of Nutrition
21 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.7%
26
Cureus
67 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.7%
27
Annals of Epidemiology
19 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.7%
28
The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition
19 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
29
BMJ Public Health
18 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.7%
30
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 13%
0.7%