Back

One-year efficacy and tolerability of 0.05% atropine for myopia control in Estonia: a prospective cohort study

Linntam, D.; Palumaa, K.; Palumaa, T.

2026-04-04 ophthalmology
10.64898/2026.04.02.26348423 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background: Despite strong evidence from controlled trials, uncertainty remains about the real-world use of 0.05% atropine in patients with lighter irises due to tolerability concerns, and predictors of treatment response are poorly understood. Here, we evaluated the effectiveness, tolerability, and early biometric response to 0.05% atropine in clinical practice among patients with predominantly light irises. Methods: This prospective cohort study included 33 patients treated with 0.05% atropine (82% with light irises). Cycloplegic spherical equivalent refraction (SER) was measured at baseline and 3-month intervals. Axial length (AL), photopic pupil diameter, accommodation amplitude, and subjective side effects were monitored more frequently initially. Results: Median age at treatment initiation was 11.97 years, SER -5.38 D, and AL 25.42 mm. Over 12 months, SER changed by -0.078 {+/-} 0.349 D (mean {+/-} SD), and AL increased by 0.052 {+/-} 0.115 mm. Eighty-eight percent of participants had a SER change of <0.5 D, and 91% had axial elongation of <0.2 mm, indicating clinically limited myopia progression. Photopic pupil diameter was larger, and accommodation amplitude was reduced throughout follow-up. Early in treatment, side effects, including photophobia and near-work difficulties, were common but minimally disruptive. Their incidence decreased rapidly and rarely required treatment modification. In exploratory analyses, early AL changes predicted 12-month AL outcomes, with associations detectable as early as 1 week and strengthening over time. Conclusions: 0.05% atropine was well tolerated and effective in this population with light irises. Early AL changes may predict 12-month treatment response. These findings support the implementation of 0.05% atropine in routine clinical practice in populations with light irises and highlight the potential for early AL monitoring to guide timely treatment adjustments.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.