One-year efficacy and tolerability of 0.05% atropine for myopia control in Estonia: a prospective cohort study
Linntam, D.; Palumaa, K.; Palumaa, T.
Show abstract
Background: Despite strong evidence from controlled trials, uncertainty remains about the real-world use of 0.05% atropine in patients with lighter irises due to tolerability concerns, and predictors of treatment response are poorly understood. Here, we evaluated the effectiveness, tolerability, and early biometric response to 0.05% atropine in clinical practice among patients with predominantly light irises. Methods: This prospective cohort study included 33 patients treated with 0.05% atropine (82% with light irises). Cycloplegic spherical equivalent refraction (SER) was measured at baseline and 3-month intervals. Axial length (AL), photopic pupil diameter, accommodation amplitude, and subjective side effects were monitored more frequently initially. Results: Median age at treatment initiation was 11.97 years, SER -5.38 D, and AL 25.42 mm. Over 12 months, SER changed by -0.078 {+/-} 0.349 D (mean {+/-} SD), and AL increased by 0.052 {+/-} 0.115 mm. Eighty-eight percent of participants had a SER change of <0.5 D, and 91% had axial elongation of <0.2 mm, indicating clinically limited myopia progression. Photopic pupil diameter was larger, and accommodation amplitude was reduced throughout follow-up. Early in treatment, side effects, including photophobia and near-work difficulties, were common but minimally disruptive. Their incidence decreased rapidly and rarely required treatment modification. In exploratory analyses, early AL changes predicted 12-month AL outcomes, with associations detectable as early as 1 week and strengthening over time. Conclusions: 0.05% atropine was well tolerated and effective in this population with light irises. Early AL changes may predict 12-month treatment response. These findings support the implementation of 0.05% atropine in routine clinical practice in populations with light irises and highlight the potential for early AL monitoring to guide timely treatment adjustments.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- The evaluation of a web‐based tool for measuring the uncorrected visual acuity and refractive error in keratoconus eyes: a prospective open‐label method comparison study 96%
- Reading; through the eyes of a university student: A double-masked randomised placebo-controlled cross-over protocol investigating coloured spectacle lens efficacy in adults with visual stress 95%
- Sociodemographic predictors of acute corneal hydrops in patients with unstable keratoconus 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Relating Standardized Automated Perimetry Performed with Stimulus Sizes III and V in Eyes With Field Loss due to Glaucoma and NAION 94%
- Advanced Retinal Imaging and Ocular Parameters of the Rhesus Macaque Eye 94%
- Visual field evaluation using Zippy Adaptive Threshold Algorithm (ZATA) Standard and ZATA Fast in patients with glaucoma and healthy individuals 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Risk Model for Intraoperative Complication during Cataract Surgery Based on Data from 900,000 Eyes – Previous Intravitreal Injection is a Risk Factor 94%
- Optic nerve tortuosity and displacements during horizontal eye movements in healthy and highly myopic subjects 94%
- Macula structural and vascular differences in glaucoma eyes with and without high axial myopia 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Revisiting the Trans-Ancestry Genetic Correlation of Refractive Error 92%
- Iris Morphological and Biomechanical Factors Influencing Angle Closure During Pupil Dilation 92%
- Inner limiting Membrane Peel Extends In vivo Calcium Imaging of Retinal Ganglion Cell Activity Beyond the Fovea in Non-Human Primate 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.