Back

Interpretable Deep Learning-Based Multi-Omics Integrationfor Prognosis in Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Znabu, B. F.; Atif, Z.

2026-04-05 bioinformatics
10.64898/2026.04.01.715980 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a leading cause of cancer mortality worldwide, yet existing prognostic models incompletely capture its molecular heterogeneity. We developed an interpretable, attention-based multi-branch deep learning framework for multi-omics survival prediction in HCC. Using 358 TCGA LIHC patients with matched mRNA expression, miRNA expression, and DNA methylation data, we first reproduced the Chaudhary et al. autoencoder-based survival model as a baseline (C-index = 0.561, log-rank p = 3.10 x 10-2). We then designed a multi-branch architecture with omics-specific encoders, multi-head attention fusion, and Cox partial likelihood training, optimized via Bayesian hyperparameter search (100 Optuna trials). In 5-fold stratified cross-validation with nested feature selection (no data leakage), our attention model achieved a mean C-index of 0.683 {+/-} 0.039, outperforming the autoencoder baseline (0.561) and clinical-only model (0.637), and performing similarly to an AUTOSurv-like benchmark (0.697). Branch dropout enabled single-omics inference; external validation on the real GSE14520 cohort (n=221, mRNA) achieved a C-index of 0.637 (p = 0.004), comparable to Chaudhary et al.s reported 0.67 on the same data. Integrated gradients and attention weights highlighted features with prior links to HCC biology, including cell cycle genes (CCNA2, PLK1) and a Wnt pathway component (FZD7), along with candidate biomarkers stable across all cross-validation folds (PZP, SGCB, CD300LG, ZNF831 for mRNA; 12 miRNAs; 6 CpG sites). Differential expression analysis between model-defined risk groups identified 381 significant genes (Bonferroni p < 0.05), though this analysis is partly circular. Multivariable Cox regression indicated that the model-derived risk score adds prognostic value beyond clinical variables, with consistent performance across clinical subgroups, though clinical integration metrics were evaluated on training data. This framework provides a transparent, biologically grounded approach to multi-omics prognostication in HCC.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 1%
28.5%
2
Nature Machine Intelligence
61 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.7%
3
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 4%
4.4%
4
Cell Reports Medicine
140 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
4.4%
5
Cell Genomics
162 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.1%
50% of probability mass above
6
Cell Systems
167 papers in training set
Top 3%
3.7%
7
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 9%
3.7%
8
Genome Medicine
154 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.7%
9
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.7%
10
Bioinformatics
1061 papers in training set
Top 6%
2.4%
11
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 55%
1.8%
12
Patterns
70 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.7%
13
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 20%
1.5%
14
Nature Biomedical Engineering
42 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.4%
15
Nature Medicine
117 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.4%
16
eBioMedicine
130 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.4%
17
Nucleic Acids Research
1128 papers in training set
Top 13%
1.3%
18
Frontiers in Genetics
197 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.3%
19
Briefings in Bioinformatics
326 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.3%
20
Nature Biotechnology
147 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.8%
21
Cancer Cell
38 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
22
npj Systems Biology and Applications
99 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
23
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 56%
0.8%
24
Nature Genetics
240 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.8%
25
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 46%
0.7%
26
Journal of Genetics and Genomics
36 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
27
Gut
36 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.7%
28
Nature Cancer
35 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
29
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 39%
0.5%
30
npj Digital Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.5%