Back

Repeatability of adaptation in interacting species

Hablützel, L.; MacPherson, A.; Bank, C.

2026-04-06 evolutionary biology
10.64898/2026.04.01.715933 bioRxiv
Show abstract

In many systems, mutations can have background-dependent fitness effects due to genetic interactions between loci within a genome (intragenomic epistasis). In some cases, such as when species are coevolving, genetic interactions between loci can span across species; this is described as intergenomic epistasis. It is known that intragenomic epistasis can make adaptation more repeatable by constraining accessible mutational paths. Here, we investigate whether intergenomic epistasis leads to the same pattern of increased repeatability and how repeatability is influenced by the interplay of intra- and intergenomic epistasis. For this, we model a two-species system in which the fitness of a species depends on the combination of genotypes that are present in both species. We implement this system using an NKC model, which allows us to construct coevolutionary fitness landscapes on which we simulate adaptation by means of mutations in both species. To quantify the repeatability of adaptation, we track the realised endpoints of adaptive walks and record the distribution of fitnesses of the focal and partner species at these evolutionary endpoints. We find that intergenomic epistasis creates highly repeatable patterns of adaptation that depend on the underlying shape of the coevolutionary landscapes. The patterns of repeatability deviate from expectations based on intragenomic epistasis due to fitness trade-offs between species, which can lead to cycling and large co-evolutionary fitness loads.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Evolution
199 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
26.1%
2
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
341 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
9.2%
3
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 4%
7.2%
4
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
7.2%
5
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 16%
4.2%
50% of probability mass above
6
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 37%
4.0%
7
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 22%
4.0%
8
The American Naturalist
114 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
4.0%
9
Genetics
225 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.6%
10
Journal of Evolutionary Biology
98 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.4%
11
Evolution Letters
71 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
2.1%
12
GENETICS
189 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.9%
13
Molecular Biology and Evolution
488 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.8%
14
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 62%
1.5%
15
Bulletin of Mathematical Biology
84 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
16
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
189 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
17
Nature Ecology & Evolution
113 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.0%
18
Cell Systems
167 papers in training set
Top 10%
1.0%
19
Journal of Theoretical Biology
144 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
20
Mathematical Biosciences
42 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
21
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
53 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
22
Evolutionary Ecology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
23
Ecology Letters
121 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
24
BMC Biology
248 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
25
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 37%
0.7%
26
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 23%
0.7%
27
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 73%
0.5%
28
PNAS Nexus
147 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.5%
29
Genome Biology and Evolution
280 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%
30
BMC Ecology and Evolution
49 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%