Back

Symbiotic Escherichia coli strains can better colonize host stinkbugs and outcompete natural symbiotic bacteria, but confer less fitness benefits

Cai, W.; Moriyama, M.; Nishide, Y.; Koga, R.; Fukatsu, T.

2026-04-02 microbiology
10.64898/2026.04.01.715892 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The stinkbug Plautia stali harbors essential gut symbiotic bacteria of the genus Pantoea, whose natural strains differ in cultivability and host benefits. Using this system, we evaluated how laboratory-evolved and genetically-engineered symbiotic Escherichia coli strains compete against native Pantoea symbionts and how they influence host fitness. In single infection assays, the native uncultivable symbiont Sym A conferred the highest host performance, whereas the evolved (CmL05G13) and artificial ({Delta}cyaA) symbiotic E. coli strains supported host survival at levels comparable to cultivable Pantoea symbionts (Sym C-F). In competitive co-infection assays, the symbiotic E. coli strains generally showed unexpectedly strong colonization ability. CmL05G13 outcompeted all the cultivable symbionts Sym C-F and even displaced the native uncultivable symbiont Sym A, whereas {Delta}cyaA and the nonsymbiotic control E. coli {Delta}intS were dominated by Sym A at the adult stage. Despite their superior infection competitiveness, the symbiotic E. coli strains provided limited reproductive benefits, behaving as "cheater-like" associates. They were able to invade and dominate the symbiotic organ but failed to match the fitness contributions of native symbionts. These results demonstrate that the experimentally evolved E. coli can rapidly acquire strong colonization ability surpassing that of the natural symbionts that have coevolved with P. stali in nature. At the same time, the mismatch between infection success and host fitness benefits highlights potential evolutionary conflicts and provides an experimental model for studying the dynamics of cheating, mutualism, and symbiont replacement in vertically transmitted symbioses. IMPORTANCEUnderstanding how novel symbionts invade and displace long-term mutualists is central to the evolution of symbiosis. This study demonstrates that Escherichia coli, originally a nonsymbiotic bacterium, can rapidly evolve potent colonization ability and even outcompete native Pantoea symbionts of the stinkbug Plautia stali. Meanwhile, these competitive E. coli strains confer markedly lower reproductive benefits compared with the native symbionts that have developed intimate mutualistic association with host P. stali over evolutionary time, revealing a striking decoupling between infection success and host fitness. This finding highlights the potential for cheater-like microbes to invade vertically transmitted symbioses and destabilize coevolved partnerships. By combining experimental evolution, controlled co-infections, and quantitative analyses, the P. stali-E. coli experimental symbiotic system provides a powerful model for studying the mechanisms and evolutionary dynamics of mutualism, cheating, and symbiont replacement.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
mBio
750 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
18.0%
2
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 6%
9.9%
3
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 6%
9.9%
4
The ISME Journal
194 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
8.3%
5
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
7.1%
50% of probability mass above
6
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 27%
6.7%
7
Nature Ecology & Evolution
113 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
4.8%
8
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
341 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.7%
9
Cell Systems
167 papers in training set
Top 5%
2.6%
10
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 19%
2.6%
11
Science
429 papers in training set
Top 11%
2.6%
12
Current Biology
596 papers in training set
Top 7%
2.3%
13
Cell Host & Microbe
113 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.9%
14
mSystems
361 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.7%
15
Cell
370 papers in training set
Top 13%
1.3%
16
Environmental Microbiology
119 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
17
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 21%
1.1%
18
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
19
PLOS Pathogens
721 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.9%
20
PLOS Genetics
756 papers in training set
Top 13%
0.9%
21
Nature Microbiology
133 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
22
mSphere
281 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
23
PNAS Nexus
147 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
24
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 77%
0.7%
25
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 27%
0.7%
26
npj Biofilms and Microbiomes
56 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%