Back

Evolving initial conditions: an alternative developmental route to morphological diversity

Taylor, S. E.; Hammond, J. E.; Verd, B.

2026-04-03 developmental biology
10.64898/2026.04.01.715779 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Phenotypic diversity is often thought to arise from the evolutionary modification of developmental processes. However, developmental processes are tightly coupled in space and time, with each process beginning from conditions set by the one before it. While we know from dynamical systems theory that initial conditions can significantly affect a systems out-come, their importance as a source of phenotypic evolvability has been largely overlooked. Here we show for the first time, that phenotypic evolution can proceed through changes in developmental initial conditions while the underlying developmental process remains conserved. Somitogenesis is the process by which vertebral precursors, known as somites, are periodically patterned in the pre-somitic mesoderm (PSM). Somitic count (total number of somites) is thought to diversify through the evolution of components of somitogenesis such as the tempo of the segmentation clock or the mechanisms driving axial morphogenesis. Using two closely related species of Lake Malawi cichlid fishes that differ in vertebral counts, we show that somite count evolution has happened without changes to somitogenesis itself, but instead, by altering the size of the PSM at the onset of this process. This work will expand what we consider developmental drivers of phenotypic evolution and highlight the importance of comparative studies to understand the diversification of phenotypes.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
341 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
22.9%
2
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
189 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
8.3%
3
The American Naturalist
114 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
6.5%
4
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 16%
4.9%
5
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
4.9%
6
Evolution
199 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
4.9%
50% of probability mass above
7
Journal of Theoretical Biology
144 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.6%
8
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 4%
3.6%
9
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 9%
3.6%
10
BioSystems
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.5%
11
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 29%
1.9%
12
Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
218 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.8%
13
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 55%
1.8%
14
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 9%
1.7%
15
BMC Ecology and Evolution
49 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.4%
16
Royal Society Open Science
193 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
17
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 28%
1.2%
18
Biophysical Journal
545 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.1%
19
Bulletin of Mathematical Biology
84 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
20
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 58%
1.0%
21
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 62%
1.0%
22
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
60 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
23
Developmental Biology
134 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
24
Current Biology
596 papers in training set
Top 14%
0.8%
25
Genetics
225 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
26
Journal of Experimental Zoology Part B: Molecular and Developmental Evolution
22 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
27
Physical Review Research
46 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.7%
28
BMC Biology
248 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.7%
29
PLOS Genetics
756 papers in training set
Top 17%
0.7%
30
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
53 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%