Back

Can Individual Internal Models Predict Idiosyncratic Scene Exploration?

Engeser, M.; Babaei, N.; Kaiser, D.

2026-04-03 neuroscience
10.64898/2026.04.01.715777 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Each individual person looks at natural scenes in their own unique way, resulting in a distinct perceptual experience of the world. However, little is known about why such differences in gaze emerge. Here, we test the hypothesis that idiosyncrasies in gaze behavior are predicted by inter-subject variations in internal models--expectations about how scenes typically look. In two experiments, we first characterized participants personal internal models by asking them to draw typical bathroom and kitchen scenes. Individual differences in these drawings were quantified using an objective deep learning pipeline and, in turn, related to individual differences in gaze behavior. In Experiment 1, where participants freely viewed a set of kitchen and bathroom photographs, inter-subject similarities in internal models did not predict inter-subject similarities in gaze. In Experiment 2, we encouraged strategic exploration through gaze-contingent viewing and a memory task. Here, inter-subject similarities in internal models predicted similarities in fixation frequency and the sequence in which different object categories were inspected. These findings suggest that the influence of internal models on visual exploration is stronger under increased sensory uncertainty and when expectation-guided sampling of the environment is encouraged. Together, our results provide new insights into how individual expectations shape gaze behavior and help explain why people differ in how they explore the visual world.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 1%
18.6%
2
Journal of Vision
92 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.4%
3
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 5%
10.0%
4
Cognition
44 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.8%
5
The Journal of Neuroscience
928 papers in training set
Top 2%
6.3%
50% of probability mass above
6
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 29%
6.3%
7
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 24%
4.8%
8
Psychological Science
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.9%
9
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 22%
3.9%
10
Nature Human Behaviour
85 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
3.6%
11
Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience
119 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.1%
12
Communications Psychology
20 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.1%
13
eneuro
389 papers in training set
Top 4%
2.1%
14
Current Biology
596 papers in training set
Top 9%
1.7%
15
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 18%
1.5%
16
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.3%
17
Neuroscience of Consciousness
12 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.3%
18
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 59%
1.3%
19
Consciousness and Cognition
17 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.1%
20
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 30%
0.7%
21
Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
0.7%
22
Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
0.7%
23
Neuron
282 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.7%
24
Journal of Neurophysiology
263 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%