Back

Automated Detection of Macro-Reentrant Atrial Tachycardia Circuits Using LAT-Derived Graph Networks

Talke, M.; Majumder, J.; Lavelle, M.; Schwartz, S.; Ciaccio, E. J.; Yarmohammadi, H.; Rubin, G.; Hennessey, J. A.; Biviano, A. B.; Garan, H.; Wan, E. Y.; Goldbarg, S.; Kim, J.-H.; Hendon, C. P.; Saluja, D.

2026-04-03 cardiovascular medicine
10.64898/2026.04.01.26350012 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background: Accurate identification of macro-reentrant atrial tachycardia (AT) circuits is critical for successful ablation but remains challenging with conventional mapping techniques. The aim of this study was to automatically detect macro-reentrant AT loops from high-density local activation time (LAT) maps. Methods: We developed an algorithm for automated detection of macro-reentrant AT circuits using LAT-derived directed graphs. Compared to previous graph-based approaches, the algorithm is designed to identify the fastest-conducting reentrant pathways and cluster them by rotational orientation (clockwise vs. counterclockwise) to distinguish single- from dual-loop circuits. The algorithm was applied retrospectively to 60 macro-reentrant scar-related AT cases mapped with CARTO or Ensite from two institutions. The results were compared with blinded expert electrophysiologist annotations of loop location and single- vs. dual-loop classification. Results: The 60 cases included 16 right atrial and 44 left atrial ATs from 51 patients. Expert review identified 57% single-loop and 43% dual-loop circuits. Compared with expert annotation, the algorithm correctly identified anatomical loop locations with 88% accuracy and correctly distinguished single- vs. dual-loop ATs in 93% of cases. Conclusion: Our LAT graph-based algorithm automatically identified single- and dual-loop macro-reentrant AT circuits. Localizing these pathways may provide insight into circuit mechanisms and help guide ablation.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.