Back

Multimodal Wearable and Survey Data Reveal Distinct Physiologic Profiles in Hypermobile-Ehlers Danlos Syndrome for Screening Advancements

Wilson, D. A.; Shilling, M.; Nowak, T.; Wo, J. M.; Francomano, C. A.; Everett, T.; Ward, M. P.

2026-04-03 gastroenterology
10.64898/2026.04.01.26349981 medRxiv
Show abstract

Hypermobile Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome (hEDS) is a genetic connective tissue disorder characterized by hypermobile joints, chronic pain, fatigue, brain fog, orthostatic intolerance, and GI symptoms and dysmotility. Its heterogeneous presentation contributes to poor quality of life, inappropriate interventions, and prolonged diagnostic delays, often up to 10 years. This study primarily aimed to determine if physiological signals captured by a medical-grade wrist wearable could characterize autonomic patterns in hEDS and relate them to symptoms. Individuals with hEDS (n=30) and healthy controls (n=28) wore a medical grade smartwatch for 30 days, collecting continuous heart rate variability, activity, oxygen saturation, and blood pressure, alongside initial baseline symptom and quality-of-life surveys. Individuals with hEDS showed greater instability and variability in both systolic and diastolic blood pressure as well as the HRV metric LF/HF ratio, in comparison to healthy controls (p-values: 0.04, 0.02, 0.02). During sleep, metrics of parasympathetic activity (HRV measures: HF power, pNN50, RMSSD) trended lower in hEDS than healthy in comparison. As expected, survey domains assessing physiologic symptoms and quality-of-life were significantly worse in the hEDS cohort (p-values < 0.05). Notably, autonomic metrics correlated with GI symptoms in the hEDS cohort (Spearman's {rho} range: 0.38-0.60), and psychological symptoms in the healthy cohort (Spearman's {rho} range: -0.47-0.41). Principal component analysis (PCA) of physiologic and symptom features clearly separated groups, supporting distinct physiologic profiles. Combination of GI symptom index and wearable monitoring show promise as a hybrid screening approach that could substantially shorten the time to diagnosis in this population.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Frontiers in Physiology
93 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
23.2%
2
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 4%
10.8%
3
Journal of Personalized Medicine
28 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.4%
4
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 24%
7.0%
5
Biomedicines
66 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.5%
50% of probability mass above
6
Physiological Measurement
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.8%
7
IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics
34 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.7%
8
Frontiers in Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.2%
9
Journal of Translational Medicine
46 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.9%
10
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
11
American Journal of Gastroenterology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
12
Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
218 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.7%
13
Journal of Medical Internet Research
85 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
14
The Journal of Pain
26 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
15
eBioMedicine
130 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.4%
16
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 24%
1.0%
17
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism
35 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
18
Sleep Medicine
18 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
19
Neurogastroenterology & Motility
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
0.8%
20
Sleep
26 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%
21
Sensors
39 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
22
IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering
38 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
23
Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
18 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.7%
24
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 60%
0.7%
25
Frontiers in Neuroscience
223 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.7%
26
npj Digital Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
27
Genes
126 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
28
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
49 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.5%
29
Journal of Biophotonics
16 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.5%
30
JMIR Formative Research
32 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%