Back

Molecular surveillance of Falciparum malaria in Rwanda: Shifts in parasite prevalence and risk factors between the 2014/15 and 2019/20 Rwanda Demographics and Health Surveys

Zuromski, J.; Wernsman Young, N.; Gashema, P.; Iradukunda, V.; Bosco, N. J.; Sadler, J. M.; Gaither, C.; Munyaneza, T.; Connelly, S.; Lee, L. E.; Goel, V.; Mambo Muvunyi, C.; De Dieu Butera, J.; Mazarati, J. B.; Juliano, J. J.; Bailey, J. A.

2026-04-03 infectious diseases
10.64898/2026.04.01.26349976 medRxiv
Show abstract

Rwanda is a malaria endemic country and a focal point for emerging Plasmodium falciparum artemisinin partial resistance (ART-R). While Demographic and Health Surveys (DHS) provide both national and province-level representative data, malaria testing in Rwandan DHS (RDHS) studies has been limited to a subset of adult women and children under 5 years using RDT and/or microscopy. Recent work using ultra-sensitive quantitative real time PCR on residual dried blood spots (DBS) from the 2014-15 RDHS revealed a significantly higher P. falciparum prevalence than detected by standard DHS diagnostics. Building on this study, we analyzed 7,127 adult DBS samples collected for HIV testing in the 2019-20 RDHS to generate updated prevalence measures. We found a national P. falciparum infection prevalence of 7.7% (95%CI [6.8%, 8.7%]), with predominantly low-density infections (median parasitemia: 7.3 parasites/uL). We assessed covariates of P. falciparum malaria infection, identifying male sex, lower household wealth, lower educational achievement, and residence at lower elevation as significant predictors. Notably, national P. falciparum prevalence decreased 53% relative to the parallel 2014-15 RDHS study, despite reports of increasing ART-R-associated mutations in Rwanda. These findings demonstrate the utility of ultra-sensitive molecular surveillance, and suggest that national malaria control efforts have substantially reduced malaria burden in Rwanda even amid rising antimalarial parasite prevalence. Subsequent studies on this data set will provide measures of minor Plasmodium species prevalence, as well as temporospatial analysis of antimalarial resistance markers in P. falciparum positive samples.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Malaria Journal
48 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
22.6%
2
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
182 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
10.2%
3
PLOS Global Public Health
293 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
10.2%
4
The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
60 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
8.5%
50% of probability mass above
5
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 11%
8.3%
6
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 42%
3.1%
7
Clinical Infectious Diseases
231 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.1%
8
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.9%
9
BMJ Global Health
98 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.1%
10
Journal of Clinical Microbiology
120 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.9%
11
The Lancet Microbe
43 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.7%
12
Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
98 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
13
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 41%
1.7%
14
Emerging Infectious Diseases
103 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
15
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 57%
1.5%
16
JCI Insight
241 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.5%
17
PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases
378 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.5%
18
BMC Infectious Diseases
118 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
19
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
134 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
20
eBioMedicine
130 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
21
Communications Medicine
85 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.8%
22
Nature Microbiology
133 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%
23
International Journal for Parasitology
21 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.6%
24
International Journal of Infectious Diseases
126 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.5%
25
mBio
750 papers in training set
Top 13%
0.5%
26
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.5%