Development and validation of an XGBoost model with SHAP-based interpretability and a web-based calculator for predicting extrauterine growth restriction in preterm infants
Xu, Z.; Yu, C.-L.; Zhang, J.-X.
Show abstract
Background: Extrauterine growth restriction (EUGR) is a common and clinically significant complication among preterm infants, contributing to adverse neurodevelopmental and metabolic outcomes. Early and individualized risk prediction remains challenging. This study aimed to develop and validate an interpretable machine learning model for early prediction of EUGR using routinely available clinical variables, and to implement a user-friendly web-based calculator for clinical use. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 1,431 preterm infants admitted within 24 hours after birth to our hospital between May 2020 and March 2025. Infants from the Yangpu campus (n=863) formed the training set, and those from the Huangpu campus (n=568) formed the validation set. Early clinical variables available within 48-72 hours were screened using the Boruta algorithm. Logistic regression, XGBoost, random forest, decision tree, and support vector machine models were developed and compared. Model performance was evaluated using area under the curve (AUC), accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, F1 score, and Brier score. SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) were applied to assess global and individual feature contributions, nonlinear effects, and interactions. A web-based calculator was constructed based on the optimal model. Results: Nine variables were identified as important predictors: birth weight, small for gestational age status, gestational age, breastfeeding, multiple gestation, neonatal respiratory distress syndrome, patent ductus arteriosus, maternal hypertension, and maternal group B Streptococcus infection. Among the five models, XGBoost achieved the best performance in the validation set (AUC 0.922, accuracy 0.849, Brier score 0.108). SHAP analysis showed that low birth weight, small for gestational age, maternal group B Streptococcus infection, and patent ductus arteriosus were major risk factors, while breastfeeding was protective. Notable nonlinear and interactive effects were observed, particularly between birth weight and gestational age and between breastfeeding and patent ductus arteriosus. The web-based calculator provides real-time individualized risk estimation and visualized interpretation. Conclusions: An interpretable XGBoost-based model and web calculator were successfully developed and validated for early prediction of EUGR in preterm infants. This tool may support clinicians in identifying high-risk infants and guiding individualized nutritional and clinical management.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Association between endotypes of prematurity and pharmacological closure of patent ductus arteriosus: A systematic review and meta-analysis 93%
- Extremely preterm infant admissions within the SafeBoosC-III consortium during the COVID-19 lockdown 92%
- Clinical hypoxemia score for outpatient child pneumonia care lacking pulse oximetry in Africa and South Asia 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Development of a Risk Prediction Model for Sepsis-Related Delirium Based on Multiple Machine Learning Approaches and an Online Calculator 94%
- Experience in the implementation of the early warning sign system in obstetric patients (Maternal Early Warning Criteria, MEWC) during early postpartum. A prospective observational study 94%
- Development and external validation of machine learning algorithms for postnatal gestational age estimation using clinical data and metabolomic markers 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- A Regularized Cox Hierarchical Model for Incorporating Annotation Information in Predictive Omic Studies 90%
- A compact encoding of the genome suitable for machine learning prediction of traits and genetic risk scores. 89%
- FARFOOD: A database of potential interactions between food compounds and drugs. 88%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.