"Mapping Stakeholder Engagement in Endometriosis Care Innovation: Insights from the VendoR Project"
Mahdikhani, S.; Cleary, F.; Cummins, S.
Show abstract
Objectives: Endometriosis affects approximately 10% of reproductive age women worldwide, yet care pathways remain fragmented and treatments have limitations. This study aimed to identify and categorize key stakeholders in endometriosis care in Ireland, assess their influence and interest in the digital health initiative, and identify drivers and barriers affecting uptake of innovative approaches to care. Methods: A virtual stakeholder mapping workshop was conducted with participants from healthcare, policy, education, technology, academia, and patient communities. Using a structured MS Teams Whiteboard, participants generated a stakeholder list, positioned stakeholders on an Influence-Interest Matrix, and provided qualitative insights on factors enabling or constraining engagement with digital health innovation. Results: Stakeholders were distributed across all four quadrants of the matrix. High-interest/high-influence stakeholders included the HSE, specialist centres, general practitioners, and the Endometriosis Association of Ireland. High-interest/low-influence groups comprised patients, families, and online communities, while policymakers, hospital managers, and the education sector were identified as high-influence but low-interest actors. Key drivers included strong patient advocacy, institutional support such as engagement from the HSE, and growing awareness of digital health tools. Major barriers encompassed prolonged diagnostic delays, resource constraints, gaps in clinical knowledge, technology anxiety, and challenges sustaining engagement. Conclusions: Stakeholder mapping provided an evidence-informed foundation for the VendoR project, revealing engagement gaps and leverage points critical for improving endometriosis care innovation. The findings highlight the need for intentional, well-resourced strategies that elevate patient voices, address systemic barriers, and ensure balanced representation, supporting the co-design, co-creation, and co-production of digital health interventions for sustainable, patient-centred care.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Benefits and Challenges of Using Virtual Primary Care During the COVID-19 Pandemic: From Key Lessons to a Framework for Implementation 94%
- Defining Destigmatizing Design Guidelines for Use in Sexual Health-Related Digital Technologies: A Delphi Study 93%
- The NASSS (Non-Adoption, Abandonment, Scale-Up, Spread and Sustainability) framework use over time: A scoping review 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Menopause education of healthcare professionals: A scoping review protocol 93%
- Process of Use of Evidence Products by Frontline Maternal, Newborn and Child Health Staff at the Facility Level in Ghana. 93%
- “Endless Opportunities”: A qualitative exploration of facilitators and barriers to scale-up of two-way texting follow-up after voluntary medical male circumcision in Zimbabwe 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Challenges and facilitators in pathways to cancer diagnosis in Southern Africa: A qualitative study 94%
- Acceptability of extending HPV-based cervical screening intervals from 3 to 5 years: An interview study with women in England 93%
- Barriers and facilitators to implementing core osteoarthritis treatments in China: a mixed-method study 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- A mixed methods study of attitudes on location of gynaecological oncology outpatient care: a patient and healthcare professional questionnaire 93%
- Improving local authority financial support services for users with complex health needs: a mixed-method economic evaluation of Social Navigators in South Tyneside, UK 91%
- “We tend to get pad happy” : a qualitative study of health practitioners’ perspectives on continence care for older people in hospital 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Challenges of visibility and inclusion in Long COVID: a population-based interview study 93%
- “I don’t know what to do or where to go”. Experiences of accessing healthcare support from the perspectives of people living with Long Covid and healthcare professionals: A qualitative study in Bradford, UK 92%
- Trauma informed co-production: Collaborating and combining expertise to improve access to primary care with women with complex needs 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.