Back

"Mapping Stakeholder Engagement in Endometriosis Care Innovation: Insights from the VendoR Project"

Mahdikhani, S.; Cleary, F.; Cummins, S.

2026-04-07 health systems and quality improvement
10.64898/2026.04.01.26349826 medRxiv
Show abstract

Objectives: Endometriosis affects approximately 10% of reproductive age women worldwide, yet care pathways remain fragmented and treatments have limitations. This study aimed to identify and categorize key stakeholders in endometriosis care in Ireland, assess their influence and interest in the digital health initiative, and identify drivers and barriers affecting uptake of innovative approaches to care. Methods: A virtual stakeholder mapping workshop was conducted with participants from healthcare, policy, education, technology, academia, and patient communities. Using a structured MS Teams Whiteboard, participants generated a stakeholder list, positioned stakeholders on an Influence-Interest Matrix, and provided qualitative insights on factors enabling or constraining engagement with digital health innovation. Results: Stakeholders were distributed across all four quadrants of the matrix. High-interest/high-influence stakeholders included the HSE, specialist centres, general practitioners, and the Endometriosis Association of Ireland. High-interest/low-influence groups comprised patients, families, and online communities, while policymakers, hospital managers, and the education sector were identified as high-influence but low-interest actors. Key drivers included strong patient advocacy, institutional support such as engagement from the HSE, and growing awareness of digital health tools. Major barriers encompassed prolonged diagnostic delays, resource constraints, gaps in clinical knowledge, technology anxiety, and challenges sustaining engagement. Conclusions: Stakeholder mapping provided an evidence-informed foundation for the VendoR project, revealing engagement gaps and leverage points critical for improving endometriosis care innovation. The findings highlight the need for intentional, well-resourced strategies that elevate patient voices, address systemic barriers, and ensure balanced representation, supporting the co-design, co-creation, and co-production of digital health interventions for sustainable, patient-centred care.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 14%
14.3%
2
PLOS Digital Health
91 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.3%
3
BMJ Open Quality
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.4%
4
BMC Health Services Research
42 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.0%
5
Health Expectations
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.3%
50% of probability mass above
6
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 4%
4.8%
7
BMJ Health & Care Informatics
13 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.6%
8
British Journal of General Practice
22 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.2%
9
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 3%
3.1%
10
Frontiers in Digital Health
20 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.7%
11
Journal of Medical Internet Research
85 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.3%
12
BMJ Global Health
98 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.1%
13
JMIR Formative Research
32 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.9%
14
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
124 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.7%
15
PLOS Global Public Health
293 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.7%
16
Journal of Clinical and Translational Science
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.2%
17
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
39 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
18
JMIRx Med
31 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
19
Journal of Public Health
23 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
20
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 58%
0.7%
21
Journal of Clinical Pathology
12 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%
22
npj Digital Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
23
Healthcare
16 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
24
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 78%
0.6%