Back

Prognostic value of artificial intelligence-derived echocardiographic measurements in transthyretin cardiomyopathy

Walser, A.; Flammer, A. J.; Hundertmark, M. J.; Shiri, I.; Ciocca, N.; Ryffel, C.; de Marchi, S.; Schwotzer, R.; Ruschitzka, F.; Tanner, F. C.; Graeni, C.; Benz, D. C.

2026-04-02 cardiovascular medicine
10.64898/2026.04.01.26349281 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background: Transthyretin cardiomyopathy (ATTR-CM) is a progressive, potentially fatal disease requiring accurate risk stratification. Echocardiography is the first-line imaging modality, with AI-based tools increasingly applied for automated analysis, yet their prognostic value remains unknown. Objectives: To examine the prognostic value of AI-derived echocardiographic measurements and their incremental value beyond biomarker staging in ATTR-CM. Methods: This retrospective study included patients from two ATTR-CM registries. Baseline echocardiograms were analyzed using the fully automated AI-based software Us2.ai. Prognostic performance was assessed by Kaplan-Meier analysis, Cox regression, and ROC curves. A two-parameter echocardiographic staging system combining left ventricular (LV) global longitudinal strain (GLS) and right ventricular (RV) fractional area change (FAC) stratified patients into low (both normal), intermediate (one abnormal), and high risk (both abnormal). Results: Among 347 patients (91% male, median age 78 years), 141 experienced all-cause death or heart failure hospitalization over a median follow-up of 2.4 years. In multivariable analysis, AI-derived LV-GLS (HR 1.13 [1.03-1.25], p=0.011) and RV FAC (HR 0.96 [0.93-0.99], p=0.014) were independent outcome predictors. Echo staging stratified risk into groups with 3-fold (95% CI 1.70-5.91) and 6-fold (95% CI 3.22-10.30) increased hazard compared to low risk (p<0.001), with incremental prognostic value beyond National Amyloidosis Centre (NAC) staging and age (chi-square from 53 to 80; p<0.001). AI and human measurements showed comparable 1-year predictive performance (all p>0.05). Conclusion: AI-derived echocardiographic measurements demonstrate independent and incremental prognostic value beyond biomarker-based NAC staging in ATTR-CM, comparable to human measurements, supporting their integration into clinical risk stratification.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
European Heart Journal - Digital Health
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.4%
2
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 5%
10.5%
3
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
49 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
10.2%
4
Circulation
66 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
4.9%
5
Circulation: Genomic and Precision Medicine
42 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
4.0%
6
European Heart Journal
16 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.0%
7
The American Journal of Cardiology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
3.7%
50% of probability mass above
8
Journal of the American College of Cardiology
12 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.1%
9
Diagnostics
48 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.7%
10
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 44%
2.7%
11
European Respiratory Journal
54 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.6%
12
Journal of the American Heart Association
119 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.5%
13
Biomedicines
66 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.1%
14
Circulation: Heart Failure
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.9%
15
Frontiers in Physiology
93 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
16
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
17
The Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation
10 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
18
EBioMedicine
39 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.2%
19
JACC: Basic to Translational Science
15 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
20
Journal of Molecular and Cellular Cardiology
39 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.8%
21
Nature Cardiovascular Research
28 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
22
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 61%
0.8%
23
npj Digital Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
24
Genes
126 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
25
BMC Cardiovascular Disorders
14 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
26
Journal of Internal Medicine
12 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.7%
27
Frontiers in Neurology
91 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.6%
28
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
453 papers in training set
Top 18%
0.6%
29
The Lancet Digital Health
25 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
30
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 64%
0.5%