Back

Cervical Repetitive Magnetic Stimulation Enhances Respiratory Recovery by Modulating Neuronal Plasticity After Cervical Spinal Cord Injury

Chen, W.; Vinit, S.; Vivodtzev, I.

2026-04-03 neuroscience
10.64898/2026.03.31.715726 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Cervical spinal cord injury (SCI) frequently leads to life-threatening respiratory insufficiency by disrupting descending phrenic pathways. There is growing interest in non-invasive neuromodulatory approaches to enhance plasticity of spared respiratory circuits. We investigated whether cervical repetitive magnetic stimulation (rMS) applied to the injured cervical spinal cord promotes ventilatory recovery in a preclinical mouse model. Adult mice received a unilateral C3 hemicontusion followed by either rMS or sham stimulation. We found that rMS-treated mice significantly improved recovery of tidal volume and minute ventilation at 21 days post injury(dpi) compared to sham controls under various breathing conditions (isoflurane anesthesia, poikilocapnic phase and hypercapnic challenge). Correspondingly, diaphragm EMG enhanced ipsilateral hemidiaphragm activity in ventral and medial regions, and even contralateral hemidiaphragm activity in its ventral part. This was associated with a marked attenuation of the inflammatory response at the cervical spinal cord level. Indeed, rMS lowered astroglial, fibrotic scarring, pro-inflammatory CD68-, Iba1- microglial/macrophage markers. Moreover, perineuronal net expression (WFA positive staining) is globally reduced in the ventral spinal horn, whereas at the lesion site it is markedly increased and tightly wrapped around motoneurons. Together, these findings demonstrate that rMS promotes functional respiratory recovery after cervical SCI through combined enhancement of diaphragmatic motor output and modulation of the inflammatory and extracellular environment. Together, these functional and cellular findings indicate that spinal rMS promotes a permissive, pro-regenerative environment supporting respiratory circuit plasticity. We conclude that rMS significantly enhances ventilatory recovery via reduced inflammatory response and improved intraspinal rewiring after high cervical SCI, suggesting it is a promising non-invasive strategy. The ability of rMS to engage spared respiratory networks and support neuroplasticity highlights its promise as a safe, non-invasive therapeutic strategy with translational potential for rehabilitation of breathing function after SCI. One Sentence SummaryNoninvasive cervical magnetic stimulation improves breathing after spinal cord injury by boosting diaphragm activity and reducing inflammation.

Matching journals

The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Experimental Neurology
57 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.4%
2
Brain Stimulation
112 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
10.2%
3
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 28%
6.4%
4
Brain Research
35 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.7%
5
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 34%
3.7%
6
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 25%
3.6%
7
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 14%
3.6%
8
eneuro
389 papers in training set
Top 3%
3.6%
9
Journal of Neurotrauma
27 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.1%
50% of probability mass above
10
JCI Insight
241 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.7%
11
The Journal of Neuroscience
928 papers in training set
Top 4%
2.6%
12
Brain
154 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.4%
13
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 10%
2.1%
14
The Journal of Physiology
134 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.1%
15
Pain
70 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.1%
16
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 29%
1.9%
17
Journal of Clinical Investigation
164 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
18
Brain Communications
147 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
19
Journal of Neural Engineering
197 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
20
Progress in Neurobiology
41 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
21
British Journal of Anaesthesia
14 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.9%
22
Neurotherapeutics
11 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
23
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 28%
0.8%
24
Experimental Physiology
19 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
25
Theranostics
33 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
26
Cell Reports Medicine
140 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.7%
27
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 20%
0.7%
28
Frontiers in Neuroscience
223 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.6%
29
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 23%
0.6%
30
The FASEB Journal
175 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%