Back

Mathematical modeling and sensitivity analysis of synNotch-CAR T-cells identify engineering targets for dynamic tunability

Diefes, A. J.; Sbaiti, B.; Ciocanel, M.-V.; Kim, C. M.

2026-04-01 synthetic biology
10.64898/2026.03.31.715708 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Cancer therapeutics are increasingly incorporating engineered receptors due to their ability to detect extracellular ligands and initiate intracellular responses that regulate gene expression. By redesigning these natural signaling systems, synthetic receptors hold great potential for use in novel cell-based therapies. One particularly promising direction is modifying the Notch receptor, a transmembrane protein that naturally mediates ligand-dependent signaling at the cell surface to regulate cell proliferation and differentiation in neurogenesis. Both the intracellular and extracellular domains of Notch can be replaced with alternative domains, creating the family of modified Notch receptors known as synthetic Notch (synNotch). In existing synNotch-activated chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cells, the extracellular domain can be engineered to adjust binding affinity for a specific cancer antigen, enabling precise tuning of therapeutic activity while minimizing off-target effects. To quantify and inform such tuning, we develop differential equations models of synNotch receptor signaling and subsequent gene expression. The mathematical models couple activation dynamics on fast timescales (characteristic of receptor-ligand interactions) and on slow timescales (characteristic of downstream gene expression dynamics). Global Sobol sensitivity analysis of the proposed models highlights parameters that yield the greatest variability in synNotch signal transduction and gene expression, indicating their potential to be engineered for different functions in future cancer therapeutics. For the receptor-ligand interactions in the synNotch model, we find that ligand association and ligand-independent activation are the most sensitive parameters. In the downstream gene expression model, promoter strength and degradation rates of mRNA and gene product are found to be most amenable to engineering.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
ACS Synthetic Biology
256 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
34.1%
2
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 3%
10.4%
3
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
189 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
10.4%
50% of probability mass above
4
Physical Biology
43 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.8%
5
npj Systems Biology and Applications
99 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
3.2%
6
Biotechnology and Bioengineering
49 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.5%
7
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 47%
2.4%
8
Bulletin of Mathematical Biology
84 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.9%
9
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 52%
1.7%
10
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
216 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.7%
11
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.7%
12
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 13%
1.7%
13
Development
440 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.5%
14
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 46%
1.4%
15
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 37%
1.3%
16
Cell Systems
167 papers in training set
Top 9%
1.3%
17
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 56%
1.3%
18
Frontiers in Immunology
586 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.0%
19
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
88 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
20
Cancers
200 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
21
Journal of Theoretical Biology
144 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
22
Bioinformatics
1061 papers in training set
Top 10%
0.7%
23
PRX Life
34 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
24
Nano Letters
63 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
25
APL Bioengineering
18 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
26
Communications Medicine
85 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%
27
Frontiers in Pharmacology
100 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.5%