Back

Bridgehead invasions of ambrosia beetles are structured by inbreeding and hybridisation

Schmidt, T.; Bierman, A.; Huisamen, E. J.; Terblanche, J. S.; Hoffmann, A. A.

2026-04-01 evolutionary biology
10.64898/2026.03.31.715706 bioRxiv
Show abstract

When invasive populations establish in regions far from their origin, they risk accumulating harmful mutations (genetic load) that limit population viability and subsequent spread. This may be exacerbated by the multiple, sequential bottlenecks experienced when invasions stem from a bridgehead population. However, populations may be able to purge genetic load when they can outbreed with other lineages from subsequent invasions. Here, we analyse global invasions of a species complex of persistently inbreeding ambrosia beetles, using genomic data (N=247) from invasive populations in Africa, North America and Australia, and from native populations in Asia. We focus particularly on one species of this complex (Euwallacea fornicatus) which poses a catastrophic threat to tree species worldwide and is rapidly expanding its global range. We uncover a single lineage of this species across South Africa, California and Western Australia, derived from an invasive bridgehead and containing almost no nuclear genetic variation. In South Africa we identify a second lineage that has repeatedly hybridised with the first lineage. Genetic patterns in the native range indicate that such opportunistic outbreeding may be common. Although purifying selection was evident in all lineages, native populations had fewer missense mutations than invasive populations, suggesting that opportunistic outbreeding may help purge fixed deleterious mutations when local lineage diversity is high. These findings show how inbreeding depression can affect populations even where inbreeding is common, and they highlight the biosecurity threat posed by subsequent gene flow into invasive populations.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Molecular Ecology
304 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
16.9%
2
Current Biology
596 papers in training set
Top 1%
11.9%
3
Molecular Biology and Evolution
488 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
8.1%
4
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
8.1%
5
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 11%
6.9%
50% of probability mass above
6
Evolution Letters
71 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
6.1%
7
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
341 papers in training set
Top 1%
6.1%
8
Evolutionary Applications
91 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
6.1%
9
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 38%
3.8%
10
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 18%
3.8%
11
PLOS Genetics
756 papers in training set
Top 5%
3.5%
12
Evolution
199 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.5%
13
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 11%
1.6%
14
New Phytologist
309 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.2%
15
Science
429 papers in training set
Top 18%
0.9%
16
Systematic Biology
121 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
17
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 23%
0.8%
18
Genetics
225 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
19
The American Naturalist
114 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
20
PLOS Pathogens
721 papers in training set
Top 10%
0.7%
21
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
53 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
22
Nature Ecology & Evolution
113 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%