Back

On the feasibility of temporal interference stimulation of human brains using two arrays of electrodes

Huang, Y.

2026-04-03 biophysics
10.64898/2026.03.31.715653 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Conventional temporal interference stimulation (TI, TIS, or tTIS) leverages two pairs of electrodes to induce an interfering electrical field in the brain. Both computational and experimental studies show that TI can stimulate deep brain regions without significantly affecting shallow areas. While promising, optimization of the locations and dosages on these two pairs of electrodes for maximal focal modulation remains computationally challenging. We are the first to propose two arrays of electrodes instead of two or multiple pairs of electrodes to boost modulation focality. However, the optimization algorithm outputs too many electrodes with overlaps across two frequencies, making it difficult to implement in practice. Based on recent progress in developing multi-channel TI devices and computational work on TI optimization, here we again advocate two-array TI, but with solid software and hardware evidence to show the feasibility. Specifically, we show that the latest optimization algorithm for two-pair TI innately works for two-array TI with the fastest speed (under 30s) among all major algorithms. With a similar amount of electrodes, two-array TI could achieve better focality (3.03 cm) at the hippocampus even than TI using up to 16 pairs of electrodes (3.19 cm) that takes days to optimize. We also show a hardware implementation of two-array TI using 10 electrodes on our 8-channel TI device. We argue that two-pair TI is only preferred when one does not care about modulation focality and promote two-array TI for its advantages in focality and lower cost in terms of both optimization time and electrodes needed. We restate the focality-intensity tradeoff but in the context of TI and provide a first voxel-level map of achievable focality and modulation strength by TI in the MNI-152 head template. We hope this work will pave the way for future adoptions of two-array TI for more focal non-invasive deep brain stimulation.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Brain Stimulation
112 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
26.9%
2
Journal of Neural Engineering
197 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
23.4%
50% of probability mass above
3
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 30%
5.0%
4
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 33%
3.7%
5
NeuroImage
813 papers in training set
Top 3%
3.7%
6
Imaging Neuroscience
242 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
3.7%
7
IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering
38 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.8%
8
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 43%
2.8%
9
Physics in Medicine & Biology
17 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.7%
10
Bioengineering
24 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.0%
11
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 16%
1.7%
12
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
88 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.5%
13
Frontiers in Physiology
93 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
14
Biophysical Journal
545 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
15
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 30%
0.8%
16
Magnetic Resonance in Medicine
72 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%
17
Journal of Neuroscience Methods
106 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
18
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 62%
0.5%
19
Annals of Biomedical Engineering
34 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%
20
Neuroscience Letters
28 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%
21
IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics
34 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.5%