Back

Acoustic Salience Drives Pupillary Dynamics in an Interrupted, Reverberant Task

Figarola, V.; Liang, W.; Luthra, S.; Parker, E.; Winn, M.; Brown, C.; Shinn-Cunningham, B. G.

2026-04-02 neuroscience
10.64898/2026.03.31.715639 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Listeners face many challenges when trying to maintain attention to a target source in everyday settings; for instance, reverberation distorts acoustic cues and interruptions capture attention. However, little is known about how these challenges affect the ability to maintain selective attention. Here, we measured syllable recall accuracy and pupil dilation during a spatial selective attention task that was sometimes disrupted. Participants heard two competing, temporally interleaved syllable streams presented in pseudo-anechoic or reverberant environments. On randomly selected trials, a sudden interruption occurred mid-sequence. Compared to anechoic trials, reverberant performance was worse overall, and the interrupter disrupted performance. In uninterrupted trials, reverberation reduced peak pupil dilation both when it was consistent across all stimuli in a block and when it was randomized trial to trial, suggesting temporal smearing reduced clarity of the scene and the salience of events in the ongoing streams. Pupil dilations in response to interruptions indicated perceptual salience was strong across reverberant and anechoic conditions. Specifically, baseline pupil size before trials did not vary across room conditions, and mixing or blocking of trials (altering stimulus expectations) had no impact on pupillary responses. Together, these findings highlight that stimulus salience drives cognitive load more strongly than does task performance.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.4%
2
Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience
119 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.5%
3
The Journal of Neuroscience
928 papers in training set
Top 1%
10.2%
4
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 10%
8.5%
5
eneuro
389 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.9%
6
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 31%
4.9%
50% of probability mass above
7
The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
33 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.6%
8
Frontiers in Neuroscience
223 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.6%
9
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 19%
3.6%
10
Cognition
44 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.1%
11
Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.5%
12
Trends in Hearing
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.9%
13
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 48%
1.9%
14
Imaging Neuroscience
242 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
15
Nature Human Behaviour
85 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
16
NeuroImage
813 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.7%
17
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 41%
1.7%
18
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 16%
1.7%
19
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 19%
1.3%
20
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
341 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.1%
21
Neuropsychologia
77 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
22
Journal of Neurophysiology
263 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.8%
23
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
53 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
24
Current Biology
596 papers in training set
Top 13%
0.8%
25
Cerebral Cortex
357 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
26
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
67 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%