Back

Left atrial flow and thrombosis risk from 4D CT contrast dynamics by physics-informed neural network and indicator dilution theory

Maidu, B.; Gonzalo, A.; Guerrero-Hurtado, M.; Bargellini, C.; Martinez-Legazpi, P.; Bermejo, J.; Contijoch, F.; Flores, O.; Garcia-Villalba, M.; McVeigh, E.; Kahn, A.; del Alamo, J. C.

2026-04-03 bioengineering
10.64898/2026.03.31.715623 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Atrial fibrillation (AF) promotes blood stasis and thrombus formation, most often within the left atrial appendage (LAA), and can lead to stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA). Time-resolved contrast-enhanced computed tomography (4D CT) captures left atrial (LA) opacification and washout, but it does not directly provide quantitative stasis metrics such as blood residence time. Patient-specific computational fluid dynamics (CFD) can quantify LA/LAA residence time, yet routine clinical use is limited by computational cost and sensitivity to patient-specific boundary conditions. Here, we present two complementary approaches to infer time-resolved 3D residence time fields directly from contrast dynamics. First, a physics-informed neural network (PINN) treats contrast as a passive scalar and jointly reconstructs velocity and residence time by enforcing the incompressible Navier-Stokes equations and transport equations for contrast concentration and residence time in moving, patient-specific LA anatomies. Second, an indicator dilution theory (IDT) formulation computes voxelwise, time-resolved residence time maps from contrast time curves alone by constructing a PV-referenced impulse response and modeling transport with a tank-in-series model with spatially dependent parameters. Both methods are benchmarked against patient-specific CFD in six cases spanning diverse LA function, including three patients with TIA or thrombus in the LAA and three patients free of events. Both approaches reproduce expected spatial and temporal trends, with higher residence time in the distal LAA and higher LAA residence time in cases with TIA or thrombus. IDT demonstrates the closest agreement with CFD across the full range of residence times and produces maps in seconds, facilitating clinical translation. In contrast, the PINN additionally recovers phase-dependent atrial flow structures, but tends to smooth and underestimate the highest residence-time regions and requires hours of training. Together, these results support a scalable workflow in which IDT enables rapid stasis screening from contrast CT, and PINNs provide a complementary pathway for detailed, patient-specific hemodynamic inference when full-field flow information is needed.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
22.8%
2
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 3%
10.2%
3
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 23%
4.9%
4
Human Brain Mapping
295 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.4%
5
Medical Image Analysis
33 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.6%
6
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 38%
3.6%
7
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 8%
2.1%
50% of probability mass above
8
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 35%
2.1%
9
IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering
38 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.9%
10
NeuroImage
813 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.9%
11
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
189 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.9%
12
Annals of Biomedical Engineering
34 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.9%
13
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.8%
14
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 30%
1.8%
15
npj Digital Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
16
Computers in Biology and Medicine
120 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
17
Photoacoustics
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
18
Magnetic Resonance in Medicine
72 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.3%
19
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 54%
1.3%
20
Biomedical Optics Express
84 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.2%
21
Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology
25 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.2%
22
Nature Biomedical Engineering
42 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
23
Journal of Neural Engineering
197 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
24
Journal of Medical Imaging
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
25
Interface Focus
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.8%
26
Cancer Research
116 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
27
Neuroinformatics
40 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.8%
28
Brain Communications
147 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
29
Biology Methods and Protocols
53 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
30
Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine
27 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.8%