Back

Non-genetic inheritance of stochastically induced behavioral individuality in a naturally clonal fish

Scherer, U.; Ehlman, S.; Bierbach, D.; Pen, I.; Krause, J.; Wolf, M.

2026-04-02 animal behavior and cognition
10.64898/2026.03.31.715612 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Research on stochastic phenotypic variation (i.e., variation arising despite the apparent absence of genetic and environmental differences) has recently emerged as a rapidly growing area in biological research. But despite growing recognition of both its existence and fitness relevance, it remains unknown whether and to what extent such stochastically induced variation is transmitted across generations, potentially making it an unrecognized contributor to evolutionary processes and the adaptive potential of populations. In order to address this knowledge gap, we here performed a two-generation behavioral screening with a naturally clonal fish: 34 genetically identical mothers and their 232 offspring were separated directly after birth into near-identical environments and tracked continuously at high resolution, constituting a total of [~]19,000 observation hours. We find that consistent among-individual differences in behavioral profiles (i.e., activity and feeding patterns) of both mothers and offspring emerged despite the absence of apparent genetic and environmental differences. Mother feeding behavior - but not mother activity - was positively associated with offspring activity: mothers that spent more time feeding produced more active offspring, explaining [~] 33 % of the total variation in offspring activity. This link between mother and offspring behavior was not mediated by mother size or offspring size at parturition. Our study provides first evidence for the non-genetic transmission of among-individual phenotypic differences that arise despite the apparent lack of genetic or environmental variation, highlighting the potential importance of this variation for evolutionary processes and the adaptability of populations.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
341 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.7%
2
Current Biology
596 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
14.7%
3
The American Naturalist
114 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
8.4%
4
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 10%
6.8%
5
Molecular Ecology
304 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
6.8%
50% of probability mass above
6
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 17%
4.9%
7
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 35%
4.3%
8
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 5%
3.6%
9
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.6%
10
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 12%
2.1%
11
Functional Ecology
53 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.8%
12
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
189 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
13
Evolution
199 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
14
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
60 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
15
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 60%
1.7%
16
Journal of Experimental Biology
249 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
17
Nature Ecology & Evolution
113 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
18
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
53 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.2%
19
BMC Biology
248 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
20
PLOS Genetics
756 papers in training set
Top 13%
0.9%
21
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 17%
0.9%
22
Journal of Animal Ecology
63 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.9%
23
Biology Letters
66 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
24
The ISME Journal
194 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
25
Evolution, Medicine, and Public Health
14 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
26
Evolution Letters
71 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%