Back

Temperature-sensitive cytoplasmic incompatibility across divergent Wolbachia partly reflects cifB transcription, not endosymbiont density

Bagchi, B.; Van Vlaenderen, L.; Wheeler, T.; Provencal, E.; Conner, W. R.; McGuire, K.; Cooper, B. S.; Shropshire, J. D.

2026-04-01 molecular biology
10.64898/2026.03.31.715596 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Maternally transmitted Wolbachia bacteria are common in insects, with many strains altering host reproduction through cytoplasmic incompatibility (CI). CI kills embryos fertilized by Wolbachia-bearing males unless those embryos also carry Wolbachia, which favors females with Wolbachia and drives the endosymbiont to higher frequencies in host populations. Strong CI now underpins successful applications that rely on maintaining pathogen-blocking Wolbachia transinfections in vector populations to reduce arboviral disease transmission. Temperature modulates CI strength (the proportion of embryos killed), with consequences for Wolbachia prevalence in natural and transinfected populations. Yet the mechanisms regulating temperature-sensitive CI-strength variation are poorly understood. We quantified CI strength across eight divergent Drosophila-associated Wolbachia strains at four temperatures (18{degrees}C-26{degrees}C), while characterizing development time, Wolbachia and Wovirus densities, and transcription of the CI-inducing gene cifB. Four of eight Wolbachia strains exhibited temperature-sensitive CI, three of which induced CI at multiple temperatures. Of these three, two expressed significantly more cifB at the temperature yielding stronger CI, whereas testes Wolbachia density did not predict CI strength. Notably, cifB-transcript levels were consistently decoupled from Wolbachia and Wovirus densities, suggesting that cifB transcription is not regulated solely by symbiont abundance. We also report temperature-sensitive rescue of CI, Wolbachia-associated developmental acceleration, and strain-specific Wovirus-Wolbachia covariance. Our findings reveal temperature as a pervasive modulator of Wolbachia-host interactions at multiple levels and extend evidence that cifB transcription partly predicts variable CI strength across strain identities, male ages, and now temperatures. CI variation unaccounted for by cifB transcription points toward additional regulatory or post-transcriptional mechanisms that we discuss.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 2%
16.9%
2
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
9.8%
3
PLOS Pathogens
721 papers in training set
Top 1%
9.8%
4
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 9%
7.9%
5
mBio
750 papers in training set
Top 3%
6.6%
50% of probability mass above
6
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 34%
4.7%
7
Cell Systems
167 papers in training set
Top 3%
4.2%
8
Nature Microbiology
133 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.5%
9
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 17%
3.1%
10
Current Biology
596 papers in training set
Top 7%
2.3%
11
Cell Host & Microbe
113 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.3%
12
Science
429 papers in training set
Top 12%
2.0%
13
Molecular Ecology
304 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.6%
14
Cell
370 papers in training set
Top 12%
1.6%
15
Applied and Environmental Microbiology
301 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.4%
16
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 21%
1.4%
17
BMC Biology
248 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
18
PLOS Genetics
756 papers in training set
Top 11%
1.3%
19
Journal of Virology
456 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
20
The ISME Journal
194 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
21
Science Translational Medicine
111 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
22
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 28%
0.9%
23
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
341 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
24
Neuron
282 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.7%
25
Environmental Microbiology
119 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
26
mSphere
281 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.7%
27
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 79%
0.6%
28
Ecology and Evolution
232 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%
29
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 72%
0.6%
30
The Lancet Infectious Diseases
71 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%