Back

Decoupling Detection and Classification to Improve Morphological Phenotype Analysis of Sickle Red Blood Cells in Full-Scope Microscopy

Ma, S.; Xu, M.; Dao, M.; Li, H.

2026-04-06 bioengineering
10.64898/2026.03.31.715578 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Microscopy-based analysis of red blood cell (RBC) morphology is widely used to study phenotypes in sickle cell disease (SCD). Although AI models have been developed to automate classification, most are trained on pre-cropped single-cell images and thus struggle with full-scope microscopic images containing densely packed cells and diverse morphologies, which require both accurate detection and fine-grained classification. We propose an end-to-end computational framework to identify individual RBCs in full-scope microscopy images and classify them into five morphological categories: discocytes (DO), echinocytes (E), elongated and sickle-shaped cells (ES), granular cells (G), and reticulocytes (R). We first evaluate advanced detection-classification models, including You Only Look Once (YOLO) and Detection Transformers (DETR), and demonstrate that while these models effectively detect cells, their classification performance falls short of specialized classifiers trained on single-cell images, particularly for minority phenotypes. To address this limitation, we introduce a two-step framework in which a YOLO-based detector localizes and crops individual cells from full-scope images, followed by a fine-tuned DenseNet121 ensemble classifier that assigns each cell to one of the five morphological categories. The proposed framework achieves a detection-level F1-score of 0.9661 and a weighted-average classification F1-score of 0.9708, with an overall classification accuracy of 97.06%. Compared with the single-step YOLO26n baseline, the two-step pipeline yields a macro-average F1-score improvement of +0.1675, with particularly substantial gains for minority classes (E: +0.1623; G: +0.2774; R: +0.2603). Overall, this hybrid framework demonstrates a practical strategy for adapting fast, general-purpose detection models to domain-specific biomedical tasks by combining them with specialized classifiers, delivering both efficiency and high accuracy for scientific and clinical image analysis.

Matching journals

The top 10 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.4%
2
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 22%
8.4%
3
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
4.9%
4
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 27%
4.3%
5
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 4%
4.3%
6
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 9%
3.7%
7
Nature Biomedical Engineering
42 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.6%
8
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 45%
2.6%
9
Nature Medicine
117 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.4%
10
Nature Methods
336 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.4%
50% of probability mass above
11
Biomedical Optics Express
84 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.4%
12
Nature Machine Intelligence
61 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.1%
13
ACS Photonics
13 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.1%
14
IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering
38 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.9%
15
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 18%
1.7%
16
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 33%
1.7%
17
Photoacoustics
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.5%
18
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 19%
1.3%
19
Light: Science & Applications
16 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.3%
20
Bioinformatics
1061 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.2%
21
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 49%
1.2%
22
Journal of Biomedical Optics
25 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.2%
23
Bioengineering
24 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.9%
24
Optics Letters
13 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
25
Optica
25 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.9%
26
Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology
29 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.9%
27
Cell Reports Methods
141 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
28
BMC Methods
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
0.8%
29
npj Precision Oncology
48 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
30
Developmental Biology
134 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%