Back

Deep Learning Reveals Persistent Individual Signatures in Bat Echolocation Calls of the Greater Leaf-nosed Bat

Li, A.; Huang, W.; Xie, X.; Wen, W.; Ji, L.; Zhang, H.; Zhang, C.; Luo, J.

2026-04-02 zoology
10.64898/2026.03.31.715443 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Intraspecific variation is a prerequisite for natural selection and can manifest in various phenotypic traits, including vocal signals. However, classifying individuals based on their vocalizations, or acoustic individual identification (AIID), remains a significant challenge. This is particularly true for species that use rapidly varying echolocation calls for orientation. Here, we demonstrate that deep learning can overcome the limitation of traditional methods and reveal persistent individual signatures within bat echolocation calls. We recorded echolocation calls from 34 individuals of the greater leaf-nosed bat (Hipposideros armiger) under controlled laboratory conditions, with 19 individuals recorded repeatedly over three months. We show that a convolutional neural network (CNN) dramatically outperforms a traditional method, achieving an average identification accuracy of 84% for single calls and 91% for call sequences. In contrast, the traditional Discriminant Functional Analysis method achieved accuracies of only 39% and 47%, respectively. Through systematically altering the temporal structure of echolocation calls in input sequences, we found that temporal patterning enhances individual classification accuracy, suggesting it contributes to the encoding of individual-specific information. This study revealed that echolocation calls of H. armiger can contain stable, individual identity that were previously undetectable. Our findings highlight the potential of deep learning for non-invasive AIID and provide a methodological basis for future studies aiming to monitor animals in more dynamic environments.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
20.3%
2
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 1%
15.3%
3
Journal of Experimental Biology
249 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
7.1%
4
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 1%
6.6%
5
Current Biology
596 papers in training set
Top 4%
5.1%
50% of probability mass above
6
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 13%
5.1%
7
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 35%
4.1%
8
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
341 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.7%
9
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 7%
2.8%
10
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 45%
2.5%
11
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 6%
2.2%
12
Biology Letters
66 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.5%
13
Molecular Ecology
304 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.4%
14
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 21%
1.4%
15
Nano Letters
63 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
16
Biology
43 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
17
BMC Biology
248 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
18
Developmental Biology
134 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
19
The American Naturalist
114 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
20
Molecular Ecology Resources
161 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
21
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 22%
0.8%
22
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 15%
0.7%
23
Frontiers in Physiology
93 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.7%
24
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 28%
0.5%
25
Methods in Ecology and Evolution
160 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.5%
26
NeuroImage
813 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.5%
27
Frontiers in Immunology
586 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.5%