Back

Genomic Prediction Enables Provenance-Aware Selection in 1 Sessile Oak (Quercus petraea) using Foliar Physiological Traits

Aiyesa, L. V.; Mueller, M.; Wildhagen, H.; He, M.; Hardtke, A.; Steiner, W.; Hofmann, M.; Gailing, O.

2026-04-01 genetics
10.64898/2026.03.31.715316 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Climate change is reshaping the adaptive landscape of forest ecosystems, demanding more efficient strategies to identify and deploy resilient tree genotypes. Genomic prediction offers a powerful framework to accelerate selection for complex physiological traits underlying climate adaptability in long-lived species such as sessile oak (Quercus petraea (Matt.) Liebl.). Here, we conducted genomic prediction for three key physiological traits carbon isotope composition, nitrogen isotope composition, and the carbon-to-nitrogen content ratio (C/N ratio) measured in 746 trees genotyped with dense genome-wide markers ([~]580,000 SNPs). High genomic heritabilities were estimated across traits, with within-year prediction accuracies (Pearsons r between genomic estimated values and observed phenotypes) reaching 0.77. Notably, across-year and across-provenance predictions remained substantial (0.41 < r < 0.82), with predictability declining with increasing genetic distance (FST) between training and test provenances for nitrogen isotope composition and C/N ratio. In addition, GWAS-guided SNP preselection increased heritability capture by [~]15% relative to random SNP subsets. And, the pronounced provenance-by-environment interactions observed indicated substantial phenotypic plasticity in these traits. These results demonstrate the strong potential of applying genomic prediction to foliar physiological traits as polygenic predictors for climate adaptation in plants, support provenance-aware breeding to improve forest establishment, and provide practical strategies for deploying genomic prediction in long-lived species.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
New Phytologist
309 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
22.6%
2
Horticulture Research
43 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
12.4%
3
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 14%
12.4%
4
Journal of Experimental Botany
195 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
8.2%
50% of probability mass above
5
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 36%
3.6%
6
Plant Phenomics
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.7%
7
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 4%
2.6%
8
Frontiers in Plant Science
240 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.1%
9
The Plant Journal
197 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.9%
10
Plant Communications
35 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.9%
11
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 31%
1.8%
12
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 17%
1.7%
13
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 55%
1.7%
14
Plant Physiology
217 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.5%
15
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 47%
1.3%
16
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 27%
1.3%
17
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 15%
1.0%
18
Plant, Cell & Environment
78 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.0%
19
PLOS Genetics
756 papers in training set
Top 12%
1.0%
20
Cell Genomics
162 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
21
Nature Genetics
240 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.7%
22
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
453 papers in training set
Top 16%
0.7%
23
Frontiers in Genetics
197 papers in training set
Top 10%
0.7%
24
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
341 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.6%
25
Genomics, Proteomics & Bioinformatics
171 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.6%
26
The Plant Phenome Journal
14 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.6%