Back

Updated Health Opportunity Cost Estimates for 92 Low- and Middle-Income Countries: Implications for Global Health Financing and Donor Allocation

Ochalek, J. M.

2026-04-02 health economics
10.64898/2026.03.31.26349880 medRxiv
Show abstract

Estimates of the marginal cost per disability-adjusted life year (DALY) averted from government health expenditure (GHE) provide an empirical basis for allocating scarce health resources to maximise population health. Existing cross-country estimates have informed priority setting in several countries and international policy discussions but are based on data that are now more than a decade old. Since then, patterns of health expenditure, disease burden, and global health financing have changed substantially. This paper provides updated estimates of the marginal cost per DALY averted for 92 low- and middle-income countries (LMIC) by applying previously estimated elasticities of the effect of GHE on health outcomes from Ochalek et al. (2018) to recent data on mortality, morbidity, population structure, and GHE. Two policy options for improving health in LMIC are assessed: (1) the implications of countries allocating 15% of general government expenditure to health consistent with the Abuja Declaration; and (2) reallocating development assistance for health (DAH) to maximise health across countries. Scenario analyses use the estimated elasticities to reflect diminishing marginal returns to health expenditure when calculating the health gains associated with additional resources. Updated estimates of the marginal costs per DALY averted range from approximately $78 to $15,789 across countries. In most countries (72%), estimates are higher than in the previous analysis, largely reflecting increases in GHE. Increasing domestic expenditure to achieve the Abuja Declaration objective would avert 234 million DALYs but require $563 billion across countries. Reallocating $39.1 billion in existing DAH could avert 133.6 million DALYs. Updated estimates provide an empirical basis for informing both domestic priority setting and the allocation of international health financing. Aligning donor funding with country-specific opportunity costs could substantially increase the global health gains achieved with limited resources.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
BMJ Global Health
98 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
35.2%
2
Environmental Research Letters
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.7%
3
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 27%
6.5%
50% of probability mass above
4
PLOS Global Public Health
293 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.5%
5
The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
60 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
4.4%
6
Journal of Global Health
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.8%
7
Public Health Nutrition
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.2%
8
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 42%
3.0%
9
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 24%
2.7%
10
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 33%
2.5%
11
The Lancet Global Health
24 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.8%
12
Vaccine
189 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
13
BMJ Public Health
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
14
Social Science & Medicine
15 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
15
eClinicalMedicine
55 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.3%
16
BMC Public Health
147 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.3%
17
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.3%
18
Bulletin of Mathematical Biology
84 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
19
The Journal of Nutrition
21 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
20
The Lancet Regional Health - Americas
22 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.8%
21
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 12%
0.8%
22
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.7%
23
PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases
378 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.5%