Back

Mapping Individual Neuroanatomical Alterations to Schizophrenia Psychopathology with Normative Modeling

Spaeth, J.; Fraza, C.; Yilmaz, D.; Deller, L.; BrainTrain Working Group, ; CDP Working Group, ; Hasanaj, G.; Kallweit, M.; Korman, M.; Boudriot, E.; Yakimov, V.; Moussiopoulou, J.; Raabe, F. J.; Wagner, E.; Schmitt, A.; Roeh, A.; Falkai, P.; Keeser, D.; Maurus, I.; Roell, L.

2026-04-01 psychiatry and clinical psychology
10.64898/2026.03.31.26349848 medRxiv
Show abstract

Schizophrenia spectrum disorders (SSDs) are clinically and neurobiologically heterogeneous. Normative modeling addresses heterogeneity of structural brain alterations by focusing on individual-level deviations, but their clinical relevance in SSDs remains controversial. We mapped the relationship between individual gray matter volume (GMV) deviations and schizophrenia diagnosis and symptoms. Normative models of GMV were established using cross-sectional, T1-weighted magnetic resonance imaging data from a large, multi-site, healthy reference cohort (N = 7957). Deviations were derived for SSD patients (n = 379) and healthy controls (n =149). Patients showed a significantly more negative average deviation compared to controls and regional deviations predicted diagnostic status with adequate performance (AUC = 0.79). A more negative deviation was associated with higher symptom severity and lower cognitive functioning in SSD. Negative deviations were scattered across the brain, with the largest alterations in the salience network. Our findings strengthen the potential of normative modeling to disentangle the heterogeneous underpinnings of SSD and provide further evidence for individualized structural deviations, particularly in the salience network, as promising markers of illness severity in SSDs.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.