Experiences towards hormonal treatments: a qualitative study among endometriosis patients and healthcare professionals
Le Quere, D.; Verroul, M.; Bouvard, M.; Brault Galland, E.; Dubernard, G.; Philip, C.-A.; Haesebaert, J.; Brulport, A.
Show abstract
Objective: To investigate, in the context of endometriosis management, the perceptions of patients and healthcare professionals regarding hormonal treatment options. Design: Qualitative study using semi-structured focus group methodology. Setting: University hospitals and academic research center. Subject(s): Patients with endometriosis (n=20) and healthcare professionals (n=13) involved in their care. Intervention(s): Not applicable Main Outcome Measure(s): Focus group topics investigated representations on the concept of treatment effectiveness, emotion associated to this medical management and the perceived impact of these therapies on patient-professional and patient-environment relationship. Result(s): We highlighted a discrepancy between patients and doctors regarding the concept of efficacy of hormonal therapies. Long-term amenorrhea is the main priority for healthcare professionals, whereas pain reduction remains the immediate wait for patients. Interviewed patients reported a lack of listening and empathy, a shared-information deficit as regards treatment options and side-effects and a need to involved partner and family in care. These factors contribute to communication issues between patients and doctors and appear to contribute to significant mental burden on both sides. Among healthcare professionals, mental burden appears to arise primarily from the resource-intensive demands of endometriosis management, whereas among patients it is driven more by the need to take an active role in their own care to compensate for insufficient information provided by physicians. Conclusion: In this study, we highlighted the ambiguities surrounding the concept of therapeutic efficacy of hormonal therapies and collected several factors to try to improve shared-decision-making process in the management of endometriosis. This is designed to help us create a shared decision-making tool in the near future.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Measurement of changes to the menstrual cycle: A transdisciplinary systematic review evaluating measure quality and utility for clinical trials 96%
- Assessing the relationship between menstrual products and reproductive and urogenital tract infections (RUTIs): a systematic review evaluating the evidence and recommendations for future research 95%
- Evaluation of the efficacy of Lactobacillus -containing feminine hygiene products on vaginal microbiome and genitourinary symptoms in pre- and postmenopausal women: A pilot randomized controlled trial 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Improving experience of medical abortion at home in a changing therapeutic, technological and regulatory landscape: a realist review 94%
- Men and sexual and reproductive healthcare in the Nordic countries: a scoping review 94%
- Caesarean birth in public maternities in Argentina: a formative research study on the views of obstetricians, midwives, and trainees 93%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- The development of a multidisciplinary care pathway for patients with inflammatory bowel disease before, during and after pregnancy 93%
- Exploring the Association Between Urinary Incontinence and Depression Based on a Series of Large-Scale National Health Studies in Turkiye 93%
- Medroxyprogesterone reverses tolerable dose metformin-induced inhibition of invasion via matrix metallopeptidase-9 and transforming growth factor-β1 in KLE endometrial cancer cells 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- A qualitative study investigating the acceptability of cervical screening and self-sampling in postnatal women at 6-week postnatal check-up 93%
- Challenges of visibility and inclusion in Long COVID: a population-based interview study 91%
- Human Papillomavirus (HPV) self-testing among un- and under-screened Māori, Pasifika, and Asian women in Aotearoa New Zealand: a preference survey among responders and interviews with clinical-trial non-responders 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.