Back

The Effects of Gender Affirming Hormone Treatment on Transgender Mens Musculoskeletal Health: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Hu, K.; Brown, A.; Montagner-Moraes, S.; Singh, J.; Charlton, L.; Barrett, J.; Hamilton, B. R.

2026-04-02 endocrinology
10.64898/2026.03.31.26349844 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background: A previous meta-analysis by Singh-Ospina et al. (2017) suggested that Gender affirming hormone treatment (GAHT) does not change transgender mens bone mineral density (BMD) at any clinically relevant site; emerging studies and advances in synthesis methods necessitate an updated evaluation. The primary aim was to update the bone measures of Singh-Ospina et al. (2017), with the secondary aim to expand measures to how GAHT affects musculoskeletal health. Methods: A systematic review with meta-analysis was conducted using studies published in English up to 31 July 2024, identified through three electronic databases (PubMed, Embase, SportDiscus), and final cross-referencing in summer 2025. Primary outcomes were longitudinal changes in femoral neck (FN), lumbar spine (LS), and total hip (TH) bone mineral density (BMD). Secondary outcomes included body composition and muscle strength. Standardised effect sizes (Hedges g) were pooled using the inverse heterogeneity (IVhet) model. Results: GAHT (4 years) was not associated with significant longitudinal changes in FN, LS, or TH BMD. In contrast, substantial anabolic effects were observed, including increases in BMI (g = 0.13), body mass (g = 0.18), fat-free mass (g = 0.59), and muscle strength (g = 0.86). Heterogeneity was high for muscle strength, FN and TH BMD, limiting confidence in pooled estimates. Conversely, changes in LS BMD, BMI, body mass and fat-free mass demonstrated low heterogeneity and greater consistency across studies. Conclusion: Masculinising GAHT does not negatively affect clinically relevant BMD sites while reliably increasing lean mass and muscle strength; however, the evidence base remains methodologically weak and highly variable, particularly for FN and TH. The need for continued clinical monitoring of bone health and muscle function, alongside high-quality longitudinal research incorporating advanced imaging modalities such as HR pQCT is emphasised. Strengthening the evidence base will be essential for clarifying long-term skeletal trajectories as transgender men age. PROSPERO registration: CRD42024573102

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Bone
22 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
23.0%
2
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism
35 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
7.3%
3
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 27%
6.4%
4
Frontiers in Endocrinology
53 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
6.4%
5
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
5.0%
6
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 19%
4.4%
50% of probability mass above
7
Experimental Physiology
19 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.0%
8
Journal of Bone and Mineral Research
32 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.0%
9
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 6%
3.7%
10
Frontiers in Physiology
93 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.7%
11
Journal of Affective Disorders
81 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
3.1%
12
Journal of the Endocrine Society
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.8%
13
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.5%
14
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 49%
2.1%
15
Psychoneuroendocrinology
33 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.8%
16
Human Brain Mapping
295 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.4%
17
JBMR Plus
16 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.4%
18
The Journal of Steroid Biochemistry and Molecular Biology
10 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.3%
19
Journal of Cachexia, Sarcopenia and Muscle
27 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.0%
20
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
124 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.0%
21
Biology of Sex Differences
29 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
22
Systematic Reviews
11 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
23
RMD Open
13 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
24
Journal of Psychosomatic Research
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
25
Peer Community Journal
254 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
26
Obesity
19 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.5%