Back

The Russian FSHD registry: a first look at the cohort

Kuchina, A.; Sherstyukova, D.; Borovikov, A.; Soloshenko, M.; Zernov, N.; Subbotin, D.; Dadali, E.; Sharkova, I.; Rudenskaya, G.; Kutsev, S.; Skoblov, M.; Murtazina, A.

2026-04-01 genetic and genomic medicine
10.64898/2026.03.31.26349837 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background: Facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy (FSHD) is a common hereditary neuromuscular disorder. The Russian FSHD Patient Registry was established in 2019 following the development of a PCR-based method for genetic confirmation of the diagnosis. Results: The registry included 470 participants (51% male). Genetic confirmation was obtained for 76% (n=356), the remainder were included based on clinical and anamnestic data. Clinical assessment forms and patient-reported questionnaires were analyzed for 310 and 142 patients, respectively. D4Z4 repeat unit (RU) distribution showed patterns consistent with European cohorts, with a predominance of patients with 3 RUs. A moderate inverse correlation was found between RUs number and clinical severity scales. Periscapular weakness was the most common onset manifestation (46.8%), followed by facial weakness (31.6%) which was often unnoticed by patients. The mean age in the Russian cohort was 37.8 years (range 0-97), indicating a younger cohort compared to international data. A delta-adjusted cluster analysis (n=215) identified three distinct trajectories: a classic phenotype with onset before age 14 and early involvement of various muscle groups (n=177), and two clusters characterized by either facial or periscapular onset with slow progression. Conclusion: The Russian FSHD registry provides a comprehensive characterization of a large national cohort, revealing a predominance of patients with 3 D4Z4 repeats and a younger demographic profile compared to international data. Cluster analysis identified three heterogeneous disease trajectories, offering a framework for improved patient stratification.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Muscle & Nerve
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.6%
2
Human Mutation
29 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.4%
3
Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.4%
4
Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology
29 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.4%
5
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 18%
6.4%
6
European Journal of Neurology
20 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.6%
7
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 40%
3.6%
50% of probability mass above
8
Human Molecular Genetics
130 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
3.1%
9
Movement Disorders
62 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.7%
10
Journal of Medical Genetics
28 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.6%
11
European Journal of Human Genetics
49 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.1%
12
American Journal of Medical Genetics Part A
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.1%
13
Genetics in Medicine
69 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.9%
14
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.9%
15
Trials
25 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.8%
16
Frontiers in Neurology
91 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
17
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
453 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.7%
18
Journal of Cachexia, Sarcopenia and Muscle
27 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.2%
19
Genes
126 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
20
Neurology
44 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
21
Rheumatology
21 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
22
Biomedicines
66 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
23
Neurobiology of Disease
134 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
24
Pigment Cell & Melanoma Research
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
0.7%
25
Journal of Anatomy
27 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.6%
26
BMC Methods
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.6%
27
Neuropathology and Applied Neurobiology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.6%
28
The American Journal of Pathology
31 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.6%