Back

Non-random brain connectome wiring enables robust and efficient neural network function under high sparsity

McAllister, J.; Houghton, C. J.; Wade, J.; O'Donnell, C.

2026-04-01 neuroscience
10.64898/2026.03.30.715411 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The connectivity of brain networks is extremely sparse due to metabolic, physical and spatial constraints. Although wiring sparsity can confer computational advantages for biological and artificial neural networks, sparse networks require fine parameter tuning and exhibit strong sensitivity to perturbations. How brains achieve their efficiency and robustness is unclear. Here we addressed this by analysing the dynamical properties of Echo State Networks with wiring based on the Drosophila melanogaster fruit fly connectome, compared with sparsity-matched random-wiring networks. We evaluated these networks on a set of eight cognitive tasks, and found that connectome-based neural networks (CoNNs) typically showed narrowly distributed task engagement across their neurons. The importance of a neuron for task performance correlated with its node degree, local clustering, and selfrecurrency, and these correlations were stronger in CoNNs than in random networks. CoNNs were more robust to neuronal loss, retaining their task performance and beneficial dynamical properties such as criticality and spectral radius better than random networks. Similarly, CoNNs were more robust to hyperparameter variations in both input and recurrent weight scaling. Using theoretical arguments and numerical simulations, we show that excess CoNN node self-recurrency is sufficient to explain this enhanced robustness. Overall, these results identify non-random features of connectome wiring that allow brains to reconcile extreme sparsity with reliable computation. SignificanceBrain networks support robust computation even though they operate under extreme wiring sparsity due to metabolic and spatial constraints. While sparse networks typically require fine-tuning and are sensitive to perturbations, we show that biological connectomes support specialised, efficient task engagement and remain robust to neuron loss and parameter variation. We identify excess neuronal selfrecurrency as a key structural feature underlying this stability. These results reveal how non-random connectivity stabilises computation in extremely sparse networks, providing principles for understanding brain function and designing robust, efficient artificial neural systems.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
33.6%
2
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 4%
12.6%
3
Network Neuroscience
116 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.3%
50% of probability mass above
4
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 8%
8.6%
5
Neuron
282 papers in training set
Top 2%
6.4%
6
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 39%
3.7%
7
Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience
53 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
2.9%
8
Neural Computation
36 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
9
Nature Neuroscience
216 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.4%
10
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 28%
1.2%
11
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 68%
1.1%
12
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 26%
0.9%
13
eneuro
389 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.8%
14
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
341 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
15
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 20%
0.8%
16
Nature Human Behaviour
85 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
17
The Journal of Neuroscience
928 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.8%
18
PRX Life
34 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.8%
19
Science
429 papers in training set
Top 19%
0.8%
20
Physical Review X
23 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.5%
21
PNAS Nexus
147 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.5%
22
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.5%
23
Neural Networks
32 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%
24
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
53 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%