Back

Modeling the Influence of Bandwidth and Envelope on Categorical Loudness Scaling

Neely, S. T.; Harris, S. E.; Hajicek, J. J.; Petersen, E. A.; Shen, Y.

2026-04-01 neuroscience
10.64898/2026.03.30.715393 bioRxiv
Show abstract

In a loudness-matching paradigm, a reduction in the loudness of sounds with bandwidths less than one-half octave compared to a tone of equal sound pressure level has been observed previously for five-tone complexes at 60 dB SPL centered at 1 kHz. Here, this loudness-reduction phenomenon is explored using band-limited noise across wide ranges of frequency and level. Additionally, these measurements are simulated by a model of loudness judgement based on neural ensemble averaging (NEA), which serves as a proxy for central auditory signal processing. Multi-frequency equal-loudness contours (ELC) were measured for each of the adult participants (N=100) with pure-tone average (PTA) thresholds that ranged from normal to moderate hearing loss using a categorical-loudness-scaling (CLS) paradigm. Presentation level and center frequency of the test stimuli were determined on each trial according to a Bayesian adaptive algorithm, which enabled multi-frequency ELC estimation within about five minutes of testing. Three separate test conditions differed by stimulus type: (1) pure-tone, (2) quarter-octave noise and (3) octave noise. For comparison, loudness judgements for all three stimulus types were also simulated by the NEA model, which comprised a nonlinear, active, time-domain cochlear model with an appended stage of neural spike generation. Mid-bandwidth loudness reduction was observed to be greatest at moderate stimulus levels and frequencies near 1 kHz. This feature was approximated by the NEA model, which suggests involvement of an early stage of the central auditory system in the formation of loudness judgements.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 3%
14.2%
2
The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
33 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.2%
3
Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.7%
4
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 6%
6.3%
5
The Journal of Neuroscience
928 papers in training set
Top 2%
6.2%
6
Trends in Hearing
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.8%
50% of probability mass above
7
Hearing Research
49 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.3%
8
Frontiers in Neuroscience
223 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.1%
9
NeuroImage
813 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.1%
10
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.9%
11
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 40%
3.5%
12
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 34%
2.3%
13
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 5%
2.1%
14
eneuro
389 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.9%
15
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 54%
1.5%
16
Neuroscience
88 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
17
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
189 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
18
Human Brain Mapping
295 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
19
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 25%
0.9%
20
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 45%
0.7%
21
Biophysical Journal
545 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
22
Journal of Neuroscience Methods
106 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
23
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 33%
0.6%