Back

Local interaction networks reconstructed from global biodiversity data improve pollinator restoration decision making

Baiotto, T.; Cosma, C.; Cheung, Y. Y. J.; Narango, D.; Woodard, J.; McCarville, P.; Echeverri, A.; Horne, G.; Wood, E.; Williams, N. M.; Seltmann, K. C.; Fleri, J. R.; Owens, A.; Lequerica Tamara, M.; Boren, A.; Doneski, S.; Guralnick, R. P.; Li, D.; Guzman, L. M.

2026-04-01 ecology
10.64898/2026.03.30.715389 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Global pollinator declines threaten the health of ecosystems and food systems, underscoring the urgency of conservation actions such as habitat restoration. However, data gaps on plant use among pollinators continue to limit reliable design of restoration plant mixes. To address this, we present NECTAR (Network-Enhanced Conservation Tool for Analysis and Recommendation), a new modular framework that integrates multiple data modalities-including species distributions, phenometrics, and phylogenetic data-to infer flower visitation and host plant interactions from spatial, temporal, and phylogenetic overlap, generating spatially explicit plant-insect interaction networks that guide planting recommendations for pollinator habitat restoration. We demonstrate the utility of NECTAR by generating a large plant-insect metaweb across California, comprising 1,247,081 spatially explicit interactions for 5,131 pollinator species and 5,178 native plant species. Predicted networks recovered significantly more interactions than null models, demonstrating that integrating multiple ecological constraints improves interaction prediction. In realistic restoration simulations, NECTARs data-driven plant mix recommendations support up to 2.8 times more pollinator species compared to existing resources and random selection of plants. This optimization facilitates the inclusion of multiple goals and constraints, and provides complementary decision-making information to existing resources. NECTAR offers a scalable, evidence-based framework for translating increasingly available global biodiversity data into locally actionable restoration guidance, with broad potential to improve pollinator habitat restoration worldwide.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 2%
23.0%
2
Nature Ecology & Evolution
113 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
10.3%
3
Nature Methods
336 papers in training set
Top 2%
6.5%
4
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 10%
6.5%
5
Nature
575 papers in training set
Top 4%
6.5%
50% of probability mass above
6
Science
429 papers in training set
Top 6%
5.0%
7
Methods in Ecology and Evolution
160 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
4.4%
8
Nature Human Behaviour
85 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
3.7%
9
Journal of Applied Ecology
35 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.7%
10
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 12%
2.1%
11
Cell Systems
167 papers in training set
Top 5%
2.1%
12
Cell
370 papers in training set
Top 12%
1.5%
13
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 45%
1.5%
14
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 18%
1.4%
15
Communications Earth & Environment
14 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.3%
16
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 14%
1.3%
17
Nature Plants
84 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
18
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 15%
1.1%
19
New Phytologist
309 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.1%
20
Patterns
70 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
21
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 62%
1.0%
22
Conservation Biology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
23
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 70%
0.9%
24
Environmental Research Letters
15 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
25
Ecology Letters
121 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
26
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 36%
0.7%
27
Ecography
50 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%
28
Nature Medicine
117 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.5%