Back

Mating Systems and Evolutionary Rescue

Porwal, N.; Parrett, J. M.; Rogers, F.; Radwan, J.; Knell, R. J.

2026-04-01 evolutionary biology
10.64898/2026.03.30.715329 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Animal mating systems are hugely diverse, ranging from species where mating is essentially random to those exhibiting complex systems of mate choice by one or both sexes. While polygyny and mate choice are known to alter adaptation and persistence in a changing environment, there has been little exploration of the ways that adaptation and evolutionary rescue are modulated by other types of mating systems. We developed an individual-based model that allows random mating, female-only choice, and mutual mate choice to be compared between monogamous and polygynous frameworks and used it to explore how mating systems influence adaptive response, loss of heterozygosity, and extinction risk under worsening environmental conditions. We find that mating systems interact with population size in determining extinction risk: mate choice under polygyny lowers effective population size, small polygynous populations with either mutual or female-only mate choice lose heterozygosity quickly and so face higher extinction risks than randomly mating populations. However, in larger populations where inbreeding and genetic drift are less important, mate-choice-based polygynous systems enhance evolutionary rescue by allowing better-adapted males to dominate reproduction, accelerating adaptation and increasing resilience to environmental change. Among polygynous systems, female-only choice leads to slower loss of heterozygosity and facilitates population resilience better than mutual mate choice. These findings demonstrate that mating systems can critically shape a populations ability to adapt to environmental change and alter extinction risks, emphasizing the need to consider mating systems in designing effective conservation strategies. Significance StatementEnvironmental change threatens species survival, and sexual selection can have profound modulating processes that determine extinction risk. Sexual selection operates in a variety of mating systems, and the role of this diversity is often overlooked. Using individual-based simulations, we show that mating systems with mate choice boost evolutionary rescue in larger populations via "good genes," while in small populations, it has the opposite effect by elevating the loss of heterozygosity. These results have critical implications for conservation biology. Conservation strategies should consider mating system characteristics when assessing species vulnerability and planning management efforts to support evolutionary resilience and long-term population persistence.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
The American Naturalist
114 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
21.7%
2
Evolution Letters
71 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.2%
3
Evolution
199 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
8.1%
4
Molecular Ecology
304 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
7.9%
50% of probability mass above
5
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
341 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
7.9%
6
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
6.9%
7
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 15%
4.7%
8
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 28%
3.5%
9
Journal of Evolutionary Biology
98 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.0%
10
Ecology Letters
121 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.8%
11
Ecology and Evolution
232 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.6%
12
Journal of Heredity
35 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.3%
13
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
60 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
14
Current Biology
596 papers in training set
Top 13%
0.9%
15
Nature Ecology & Evolution
113 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
16
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 27%
0.9%
17
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
53 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
18
PLOS Genetics
756 papers in training set
Top 15%
0.8%
19
BMC Biology
248 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
20
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 64%
0.7%
21
Journal of Animal Ecology
63 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
22
Global Change Biology
69 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
23
Methods in Ecology and Evolution
160 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%
24
Genes
126 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%
25
Evolutionary Applications
91 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%