Back

Discovering Plastic-Binding Peptides with Favorable Affinity, Water Solubility, and Binding Specificity Through Deep Learning and Biophysical Modeling

Tan, T.; Bergman, M.; Hall, C. K.; You, F.

2026-04-01 biophysics
10.64898/2026.03.30.715295 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Microplastic (MP) pollution, which is present in the ecosystem in vast quantities, adversely affects human health and the environment, making it imperative to develop methods for its mitigation. The challenge of detecting or capturing MPs could potentially be addressed using plastic-binding peptides (PBPs). The ideal PBP for MP remediation would not only bind strongly to plastic, but also have other properties such as high solubility in water or great binding specificity to a certain plastic. However, the scarcity or absence of known PBPs for common plastics along with the lack of methods that can discover PBPs with all of the desired properties precludes the development of peptide-based MP remediation strategies. In this study, we discovered short linear PBPs with high predicted water solubility and binding specificity by employing an in-silico discovery pipeline that combines deep learning and biophysical modeling. First, a long short-term memory (LSTM) network was trained on biophysical modeling data to predict peptide affinity to plastic. High affinity peptides were generated by pairing the trained LSTM with a Monte Carlo tree search (MCTS) algorithm. Molecular dynamics (MD) simulations showed that the PBPs discovered for polyethylene, the most common plastic, had 15% lower binding free energy than PBPs obtained using biophysical modeling alone. PBPs with both high affinity and high predicted solubility in water were found by including the CamSol solubility score in the MCTS peptide scoring function, increasing the average solubility score from 0.2 to 0.9, while only minimally decreasing affinity for polyethylene. The framework also discovered peptides with high binding specificity between polystyrene and polyethylene, two major constituents of MP pollution, using a competitive MCTS approach that optimized the difference in affinity between the two plastics. MD simulations showed that competitive MCTS increased the binding specificity of PBPs for polystyrene and identified peptides with relatively great preference for either of the two plastics. The framework can readily be applied to design PBPs for other types of plastic. Overall, the high-affinity PBPs with desirable properties discovered by marrying artificial intelligence and biophysics can be valuable for remediating MP pollution and protecting the health of humans and the environment.

Matching journals

The top 17 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Colloid and Interface Science
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.0%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 24%
7.0%
3
ACS Nano
99 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
4.3%
4
Environmental Science & Technology
64 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
4.0%
5
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 34%
3.7%
6
ACS Synthetic Biology
256 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
3.7%
7
Science of The Total Environment
179 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.7%
8
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 42%
3.2%
9
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 8%
2.4%
10
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 15%
1.8%
11
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 40%
1.7%
12
Water Research
74 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.7%
13
ACS Biomaterials Science & Engineering
37 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.5%
14
Journal of Hazardous Materials
19 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.4%
15
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 19%
1.4%
16
Chemical Engineering Journal
10 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.4%
17
Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling
207 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.4%
50% of probability mass above
18
Langmuir
31 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.4%
19
Frontiers in Microbiology
375 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.3%
20
Environment International
42 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.3%
21
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
216 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.3%
22
Communications Chemistry
39 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.1%
23
npj Microgravity
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.1%
24
Environmental Science & Technology Letters
22 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.0%
25
Frontiers in Plant Science
240 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.0%
26
Cell Reports Physical Science
18 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.0%
27
The Journal of Physical Chemistry B
158 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
28
JACS Au
35 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.9%
29
International Journal of Biological Macromolecules
65 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
30
Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences
100 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%