Back

An Integrated Computational-Experimental Strategy For the Prediction of Small Molecules as GLP-1R Agonists

Murcia Garcia, E.; Tian, N.; Alonso Fernandez, J. R.; Cai, X.; Yang, D.; Hernandez Morante, J. J.; Perez Sanchez, H.

2026-04-01 bioinformatics
10.64898/2026.03.30.715288 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor (GLP-1R) plays a central role in metabolic regulation and is a major therapeutic target for obesity and diabetes. Peptide agonists, like semaglutide, targeting the GLP-1R remain among the most effective regulators of glucose metabolism and appetite. Nonetheless, recent reports about weight regain have limited the effectiveness of GLP1R peptide agonists, sustaining the interest in expanding the chemical diversity of GLP-1R ligands through drug discovery strategies. However, the structural complexity and conformational plasticity of class B1 GPCRs make conventional single-method virtual screening approaches prone to bias and limited chemotype recovery. Using an integrated ligand- and structure-based virtual screening pipeline, explicitly combining complementary ligand-based descriptors, multi-fingerprint similarity, electrostatic similarity, pharmacophore modeling, and multi-conformation docking under a consensus-driven selection strategy, we were able to identify three chemically distinct classes of GLP-1R agonist candidates: GQB47810, a non-peptidic molecule; neuromedin C, a peptide, and 2,5-Pen-enkephalin (DPDPE), a small peptide. From all of them, DPDPE showed the greatest effectiveness, reaching values similar to those of GLP-1, although with lower potency. Further in vitro characterization confirmed that pen-enkephalin behaved as a full agonist and exhibited dual GLP-1R/GIPR agonistic activity. These findings establish a consensus-driven and transferable computational framework for chemotype-diverse agonist discovery at conformationally flexible GPCR targets, and revealed a pentapeptide with GLP-1-like efficacy as a promising lead for next-generation small peptide therapeutics.

Matching journals

The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling
207 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
14.7%
2
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 2%
6.8%
3
Acta Pharmaceutica Sinica B
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.8%
4
Journal of Medicinal Chemistry
68 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
6.3%
5
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
216 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.0%
6
Genomics, Proteomics & Bioinformatics
171 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.6%
7
ACS Medicinal Chemistry Letters
16 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.6%
8
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 41%
3.1%
9
ACS Pharmacology & Translational Science
40 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.6%
50% of probability mass above
10
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 33%
2.4%
11
Communications Chemistry
39 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.1%
12
Briefings in Bioinformatics
326 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.9%
13
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 51%
1.7%
14
Molecules
37 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.7%
15
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 55%
1.7%
16
Cell Discovery
54 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
17
Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry Letters
10 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.3%
18
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 12%
1.3%
19
Advanced Therapeutics
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.3%
20
ACS Omega
90 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
21
Chemical Science
71 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
22
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
453 papers in training set
Top 11%
1.2%
23
The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters
58 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
24
Molecular Therapy Nucleic Acids
32 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.2%
25
Cell Reports Physical Science
18 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
26
ACS Chemical Biology
150 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
27
Horticulture Research
43 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
28
Chemical Communications
24 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
29
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 32%
0.7%
30
National Science Review
22 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%